» Articles » PMID: 33620600

Patient-reported Outcomes and Complication Rates After Lateral Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation: a Prospective Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Feb 23
PMID 33620600
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Oral surgery morbidity is highly variable based on patients' characteristics and kind of surgical intervention. However, poor data are available in the literature regarding patient outcomes after oral surgery. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome and complication rates after maxillary sinus floor elevation.

Materials And Methods: Data from the records of patients undergoing maxillary sinus elevation have been collected from a private dental office. Patient-reported outcome has been assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale to evaluate the post-operative pain (VAS) experienced in the first week following surgery and visual rating scales to evaluate discomfort level (VRS: 0 to 4) and willingness to repeat the same surgical procedure (VRS: 0 to 3). Analgesics intake, swelling onset and duration, and ecchymosis have been also recorded.

Results: VAS showed moderate values in the first 2 days (< 50) post-surgery, with a tendency to progressively decrease over the next 2 days. Average assumption of painkillers was 3.93 ± 3.03. Discomfort level (VRS) after surgery was low (median: 1; IR: 1-0), while willingness to undergo the same surgical procedure was very high (77.63% of patients). Swelling and ecchymosis were experienced by 97.36% and 51.32% of patients, respectively, with a mean duration of 4.09 ± 1.43 and 2.21 ± 2.31 days, respectively. Membrane perforation occurred in 4 cases. Other post-operative complications were not observed.

Conclusions: Maxillary sinus grafting is a safe procedure, with a low complication rate and moderate morbidity that is well tolerated by patients. Particular attention is needed in case selection, surgical planning and operator expertise.

Clinical Relevance: The analysis of patient-reported outcomes can be of great help in surgical planning and in providing correct and adequate treatment.

Citing Articles

Customized 3D-Printed Mesh, Membrane, Bone Substitute, and Dental Implant Applied to Guided Bone Regeneration in Oral Implantology: A Narrative Review.

Di Spirito F, Giordano F, Di Palo M, Ferraro C, Cecere L, Frucci E Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39452431 PMC: 11506345. DOI: 10.3390/dj12100303.


Microbiota of Peri-Implant Healthy Tissues, Peri-Implant Mucositis, and Peri-Implantitis: A Comprehensive Review.

Di Spirito F, Giordano F, Di Palo M, DAmbrosio F, Scognamiglio B, Sangiovanni G Microorganisms. 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38930519 PMC: 11205430. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12061137.


Modified Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Technique for Multiple Edentulous Spaces: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kang N, Liu C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).

PMID: 35805687 PMC: 9265290. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138019.


Long-Term Clinical Study of Implants Placed in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate.

Velasco-Ortega E, Sierra-Baztan A, Jimenez-Guerra A, Espana-Lopez A, Ortiz-Garcia I, Nunez-Marquez E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(19).

PMID: 34639277 PMC: 8508221. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18199975.


Patient's perception of recovery after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafts: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Starch-Jensen T, Ahmad M, Bruun N, Becktor J Int J Implant Dent. 2021; 7(1):99.

PMID: 34595577 PMC: 8633212. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-021-00379-y.

References
1.
Muller E, Rios Calvo M . Pain and dental implantology: sensory quantification and affective aspects. Part I: At the private dental office. Implant Dent. 2001; 10(1):14-22. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200101000-00007. View

2.
Kim S, Lee Y, Lee S, Moon H, Chung M . Assessment of pain and anxiety following surgical placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28(2):531-5. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2713. View

3.
Al-Khabbaz A, Griffin T, Al-Shammari K . Assessment of pain associated with the surgical placement of dental implants. J Periodontol. 2007; 78(2):239-46. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060032. View

4.
Tan W, Krishnaswamy G, Ong M, Lang N . Patient-reported outcome measures after routine periodontal and implant surgical procedures. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41(6):618-24. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12248. View

5.
Farina R, Pramstraller M, Franceschetti G, Pramstraller C, Trombelli L . Alveolar ridge dimensions in maxillary posterior sextants: a retrospective comparative study of dentate and edentulous sites using computerized tomography data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22(10):1138-1144. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02087.x. View