Ocular Biomechanics Due to Ground Blast Reinforcement

Overview

Journal Comput Methods Programs Biomed

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2021 Oct 1

PMID 34598082

Citations 12

Authors

Alireza Karimi

Reza Razaghi

Christopher A Girkin

J Crawford Downs

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Objective: Bomb blast injuries exerts a shearing force on the air-tissue interfaces, causing devastating ocular injury from the blast wave. Improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are usually placed at different heights from the ground to induce more severe injury through ground blast reinforcement (GBR). However, there is still a lack of knowledge of the role of GBR and IED height from the ground on ocular biomechanics, and how they can affect the intraocular pressure (IOP) in the eye. This study aimed to estimate the IOP due to frontal IED explosion at different heights from the ground using a fluid-structure interaction model with and without GBR effects.

Methods: A 2 kg IED was placed within 5 m of the victim at 5 different heights from the ground, including 0, 0.42, 0.85, 1.27, and 1.70 m. Two different blast formulations were used to simulate the IED explosion: (a) spherical airburst, with no amplification of the initial shock wave due to interaction with the ground-surface, and (b) hemispherical surface-burst, where the initial blast wave is immediately reflected and reinforced by the ground (GBR).

Results: Results revealed that the blast wave due to GBR reaches to the skull prior to the IED blast itself. The GBR also reached to the skull ∼ 0.6 ms earlier when the IED was on the ground compared to the height of 1.70 m. The highest and lowest IOPs of ∼ 17,000 and ∼ 15,000 mmHg were observed at the IED heights of 1.70 and 0 m from the ground considering GBR. However, when the role of the GBR is ignored, IOP of ∼ 9,000 mmHg was observed regardless of the IED height from the ground. The deformation in the apex of the cornea was higher when considering the GBR (∼ 0.75 cm) versus no GBR (∼ 0.65 cm). Considering GBR led to higher stresses and strains in the sclera.

Conclusions: When the role of GBR was ignored, the results showed similar patterns and magnitudes of stresses and deformations in the skull and eye regardless of the height of the IED from the ground, which was not the case when GBR was considered. The findings of this study suggest the critical role of GBR in ocular blast simulations.

Citing Articles

Corneal strain influences keratocyte proliferation and migration through upregulation of ALDH3A1 expression.

Zhang Q, Zhou X, Zhang W, Wang X, Dou S, Zhao L FASEB J. 2024; 38(23):e70236.

PMID: 39652089 PMC: 11627209. DOI: 10.1096/fj.202401392R.

Influence of Contact Lens Parameters on Cornea: Biomechanical Analysis.

Ramasubramanian D, Hernandez-Verdejo J, Lopez-Alonso J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39451343 PMC: 11505363. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11100966.

Blast injury: Impact to the cornea.

Kempuraj D, Mohan R Exp Eye Res. 2024; 244:109915.

PMID: 38677709 PMC: 11179966. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2024.109915.

Contact lens fitting and changes in the tear film dynamics: mathematical and computational models review.

Ramasubramanian D, Hernandez-Verdejo J, Lopez-Alonso J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024; 262(9):2751-2764.

PMID: 38430228 PMC: 11377471. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06400-5.

Biomechanics of open-globe injury: a review.

Wang S, Li F, Jin S, Zhang Y, Yang N, Zhao J Biomed Eng Online. 2023; 22(1):53.

PMID: 37226242 PMC: 10210437. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-023-01117-8.

References

Vurgese S, Panda-Jonas S, Jonas J . Scleral thickness in human eyes. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e29692. PMC: 3253100. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029692. View

Karimi A, Razaghi R, Sera T, Kudo S . A combination of the finite element analysis and experimental indentation via the cornea. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 90:146-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.017. View

Girkin C, Fazio M, Yang H, Reynaud J, Burgoyne C, Smith B . Variation in the Three-Dimensional Histomorphometry of the Normal Human Optic Nerve Head With Age and Race: Lamina Cribrosa and Peripapillary Scleral Thickness and Position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58(9):3759-3769. PMC: 5525554. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21842. View

Karimi A, Razaghi R, Navidbakhsh M, Sera T, Kudo S . Computing the stresses and deformations of the human eye components due to a high explosive detonation using fluid-structure interaction model. Injury. 2016; 47(5):1042-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.030. View

Ayyildiz O, Durukan A . Comparison of endoscopic-assisted and temporary keratoprosthesis-assisted vitrectomy in combat ocular trauma: experience at a tertiary eye center in Turkey. J Int Med Res. 2018; 46(7):2708-2716. PMC: 6124296. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518769798. View

Liu X, Wang L, Wang C, Fan J, Liu S, Fan Y . Prediction of globe rupture caused by primary blast: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014; 18(9):1024-1029. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2013.869317. View

Clemente C, Esposito L, Speranza D, Bonora N . Firecracker eye exposure: experimental study and simulation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2017; 16(4):1401-1411. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-017-0894-6. View

Singh A, Ditkofsky N, York J, Abujudeh H, Avery L, Brunner J . Blast Injuries: From Improvised Explosive Device Blasts to the Boston Marathon Bombing. Radiographics. 2016; 36(1):295-307. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150114. View

Choi J, Greene W, Johnson A, Chavko M, Cleland J, McCarron R . Pathophysiology of blast-induced ocular trauma in rats after repeated exposure to low-level blast overpressure. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 43(3):239-46. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12407. View

10.

Mayo A, Kluger Y . Terrorist bombing. World J Emerg Surg. 2006; 1:33. PMC: 1675994. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-33. View

11.

Roberts M, Liang Y, Sigal I, Grimm J, Reynaud J, Bellezza A . Correlation between local stress and strain and lamina cribrosa connective tissue volume fraction in normal monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 51(1):295-307. PMC: 2829275. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4016. View

12.

Notghi B, Bhardwaj R, Bailoor S, Thompson K, Weaver A, Stitzel J . Biomechanical Evaluations of Ocular Injury Risk for Blast Loading. J Biomech Eng. 2017; 139(8). DOI: 10.1115/1.4037072. View

13.

Meek K, Newton R . Organization of collagen fibrils in the corneal stroma in relation to mechanical properties and surgical practice. J Refract Surg. 1999; 15(6):695-9. DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-19991101-18. View

14.

Mader T, Carroll R, Slade C, George R, Ritchey J, Neville S . Ocular war injuries of the Iraqi Insurgency,January-September 2004. Ophthalmology. 2005; 113(1):97-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.07.018. View

15.

Sundaramurthy A, Alai A, Ganpule S, Holmberg A, Plougonven E, Chandra N . Blast-induced biomechanical loading of the rat: an experimental and anatomically accurate computational blast injury model. J Neurotrauma. 2012; 29(13):2352-64. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2413. View

16.

Norman R, Flanagan J, Rausch S, Sigal I, Tertinegg I, Eilaghi A . Dimensions of the human sclera: Thickness measurement and regional changes with axial length. Exp Eye Res. 2009; 90(2):277-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.11.001. View

17.

Karimi A, Rahmati S, Grytz R, Girkin C, Crawford Downs J . Modeling the biomechanics of the lamina cribrosa microstructure in the human eye. Acta Biomater. 2021; 134:357-378. PMC: 8542639. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.010. View

18.

Thomas C, Courtie E, Bernardo-Colon A, Essex G, Rex T, Ahmed Z . Assessment of necroptosis in the retina in a repeated primary ocular blast injury mouse model. Exp Eye Res. 2020; 197:108102. PMC: 8176655. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108102. View

19.

Weaver A, Stitzel S, Stitzel J . Injury risk prediction from computational simulations of ocular blast loading. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016; 16(2):463-477. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-016-0830-1. View

20.

Wolf S, Bebarta V, Bonnett C, Pons P, Cantrill S . Blast injuries. Lancet. 2009; 374(9687):405-15. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60257-9. View