» Articles » PMID: 36497183

Modeling the Endothelial Glycocalyx Layer in the Human Conventional Aqueous Outflow Pathway

Overview
Journal Cells
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Dec 11
PMID 36497183
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A layer of proteoglycans and glycoproteins known as glycocalyx covers the surface of the trabecular meshwork (TM), juxtacanalicular tissue (JCT), and Schlemm's canal (SC) inner wall of the conventional aqueous outflow pathway in the eye. This has been shown to play a role in the mechanotransduction of fluid shear stress and in the regulation of the outflow resistance. The outflow resistance in the conventional outflow pathway is the main determinant of the intraocular pressure (IOP) through an active, two-way, fluid-structure interaction coupling between the outflow tissues and aqueous humor. A 3D microstructural finite element (FE) model of a healthy human eye TM/JCT/SC complex with interspersed aqueous humor was constructed. A very thin charged double layer that represents the endothelial glycocalyx layer covered the surface of the elastic outflow tissues. The aqueous humor was modeled as electroosmotic flow that is charged when it is in contact with the outflow tissues. The electrical-fluid-structure interaction (EFSI) method was used to couple the charged double layer (glycocalyx), fluid (aqueous humor), and solid (outflow tissues). When the IOP was elevated to 15 mmHg, the maximum aqueous humor velocity in the EFSI model was decreased by 2.35 mm/s (9%) compared to the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model. The charge or electricity in the living human conventional outflow pathway generated by the charged endothelial glycocalyx layer plays a minor biomechanical role in the resultant stresses and strains as well as the hydrodynamics of the aqueous humor.

Citing Articles

Impact of aging on anterior segment morphology and aqueous humor dynamics in human Eyes: Advanced imaging and computational techniques.

Karimi A, Darche M, Stanik A, Razaghi R, Mirafzal I, Hassani K Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2025; 45(1):62-73.

PMID: 39958630 PMC: 11823714. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2025.01.004.


High-resolution modeling of aqueous humor dynamics in the conventional outflow pathway of a normal human donor eye.

Karimi A, Razaghi R, Stanik A, Daniel Dcosta S, Mirafzal I, Kelley M Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024; 260:108538.

PMID: 39644783 PMC: 11805654. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108538.


Numerical simulation and mathematical modeling of biomechanical stress distribution in poroelastic tumor tissue via magnetic field and bio-ferro-fluid.

Halabian M, Beigzadeh B, Siavashi M Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34651.

PMID: 39149009 PMC: 11324941. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34651.


Comparative analysis of traction forces in normal and glaucomatous trabecular meshwork cells within a 3D, active fluid-structure interaction culture environment.

Karimi A, Aga M, Khan T, Daniel Dcosta S, Thaware O, White E Acta Biomater. 2024; 180:206-229.

PMID: 38641184 PMC: 11095374. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.04.021.


Implementing new computational methods for the study of JCT and SC inner wall basement membrane biomechanics and hydrodynamics.

Karimi A, Razaghi R, Daniel Dcosta S, Torbati S, Ebrahimi S, Rahmati S Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023; 243:107909.

PMID: 37976613 PMC: 10840991. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107909.


References
1.
Pries A, Secomb T, Jacobs H, Sperandio M, Osterloh K, Gaehtgens P . Microvascular blood flow resistance: role of endothelial surface layer. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273(5):H2272-9. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.5.H2272. View

2.
Karimi A, Razaghi R, Girkin C, Crawford Downs J . Ocular biomechanics due to ground blast reinforcement. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021; 211:106425. PMC: 8577623. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106425. View

3.
Karimi A, Razaghi R, Rahmati S, Crawford Downs J, Acott T, Wang R . Modeling the biomechanics of the conventional aqueous outflow pathway microstructure in the human eye. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 221:106922. PMC: 10424784. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106922. View

4.
Kitazawa Y, Horie T . Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975; 79(4):557-66. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(75)90792-8. View

5.
Kwon Y, Fingert J, Kuehn M, Alward W . Primary open-angle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(11):1113-24. PMC: 3700399. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0804630. View