» Articles » PMID: 34574215

In-Plant Intervention Validation of a Novel Ozone Generation Technology (Bio-Safe) Compared to Lactic Acid in Variety Meats

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2021 Sep 28
PMID 34574215
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of an aqueous ozone intervention and a lactic acid solution on natural microbiota of variety meats in a commercial beef processing plant. EZ-Reach™ swabs were used to collect 100 cm area samples before and after ozone and lactic acid intervention application for three different offals (head, heart, and liver). Each repetition included 54 samples per variety meat and antimicrobial for a total of 162 samples per repetition. Enumeration of total aerobic bacteria (APC) and (EC) was performed on each sample. Microbial counts for both microorganisms evaluated were significantly reduced ( < 0.001) after lactic acid immersion (2-5%) and ozone intervention for all variety meats, with the exception of ozone intervention in EC counts of the heart samples. APC after lactic acid intervention was reduced on average by 1.73, 1.66, and 1.50 Log CFU/sample in the head, heart, and liver, respectively, while after ozone intervention, counts were reduced on average by 1.66, 0.52, and 1.20 Log CFU/sample. EC counts after lactic acid intervention were reduced on average by 0.96, 0.79, and 1.00 Log CFU/sample in the head, heart, and liver, respectively, while after ozone intervention, counts were reduced on average by 0.75, 0.62, and 1.25 Log CFU/sample. The aqueous ozone antimicrobial scheme proved to be a promising intervention for the in-plant reduction of indicator levels in variety meats, specifically heads, hearts, and livers.

Citing Articles

Rapid Quantitative Method Development for Beef and Pork Lymph Nodes Using BAX System Real Time Assay.

Vargas D, Betancourt-Barszcz G, Blandon S, Applegate S, Brashears M, Miller M Foods. 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 36832897 PMC: 9956926. DOI: 10.3390/foods12040822.


Quantitative Bio-Mapping of and Indicator Organisms at Different Stages in a Commercial Pork Processing Facility.

Bueno Lopez R, Vargas D, Jimenez R, Casas D, Miller M, Brashears M Foods. 2022; 11(17).

PMID: 36076766 PMC: 9455759. DOI: 10.3390/foods11172580.


Bio-Mapping of Microbial Indicators to Establish Statistical Process Control Parameters in a Commercial Beef Processing Facility.

Vargas D, Rodriguez K, Betancourt-Barszcz G, Ajcet-Reyes M, Dogan O, Randazzo E Foods. 2022; 11(8).

PMID: 35454719 PMC: 9032755. DOI: 10.3390/foods11081133.

References
1.
Gorman B, Sofos J, Morgan J, Schmidt G, Smith G . Evaluation of Hand-Trimming, Various Sanitizing Agents, and Hot Water Spray-Washing as Decontamination Interventions for Beef Brisket Adipose Tissue. J Food Prot. 2019; 58(8):899-907. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-58.8.899. View

2.
Casas D, Vargas D, Randazzo E, Lynn D, Echeverry A, Brashears M . In-Plant Validation of Novel On-Site Ozone Generation Technology (Bio-Safe) Compared to Lactic Acid Beef Carcasses and Trim Using Natural Microbiota and Salmonella and O157:H7 Surrogate Enumeration. Foods. 2021; 10(5). PMC: 8147810. DOI: 10.3390/foods10051002. View

3.
Oblinger J, Kennedy Jr J, Rothenberg C, Berry B, Stern N . Identification of Bacteria Isolated from Fresh and Temperature Abused Variety Meats . J Food Prot. 2019; 45(7):650-654. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-45.7.650. View

4.
Casas D, Manishimwe R, Forgey S, Hanlon K, Miller M, Brashears M . Biomapping of Microbial Indicators on Beef Subprimals Subjected to Spray or Dry Chilling over Prolonged Refrigerated Storage. Foods. 2021; 10(6). PMC: 8234038. DOI: 10.3390/foods10061403. View

5.
Signorini M, Costa M, Teitelbaum D, Restovich V, Brasesco H, Garcia D . Evaluation of decontamination efficacy of commonly used antimicrobial interventions for beef carcasses against Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Meat Sci. 2018; 142:44-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.009. View