» Articles » PMID: 34546763

Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults

Overview
Date 2021 Sep 21
PMID 34546763
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Despite the recommendation for cochlear implant (CI) processor use during all waking hours, variability in average daily wear time remains high. Previous work has shown that objective wear time is significantly correlated with speech recognition outcomes. We aimed to investigate the causal link between daily wear time and speech recognition outcomes and assess one potential underlying mechanism, spectral processing, driving the causal link. We hypothesized that increased CI use would result in improved speech recognition via improved spectral processing. Method Twenty adult CI recipients completed two study visits. The baseline visit included auditory perception testing (speech recognition and spectral processing measures), questionnaire administration, and documentation of data logging from the CI software. Participants watched an educational video, and they were informed of the compensation schedule. Participants were then asked to increase their daily CI use over a 4-week period during everyday life. Baseline measures were reassessed following the 4-week period. Results Seventeen out of 20 participants increased their daily CI use. On average, participants' speech recognition improved by 3.0, 2.4, and 7.0 percentage points per hour of increased average daily CI use for consonant-nucleus-consonant words, AzBio sentences, and AzBio sentences in noise, respectively. Questionnaire scores were similar between visits. Spectral processing showed significant improvement and accounted for a small amount of variance in the change in speech recognition values. Conclusions Improved consistency of processor use over a 4-week period yielded significant improvements in speech recognition scores. Though a significant factor, spectral processing is likely not the only mechanism driving improvement in speech recognition; further research is warranted.

Citing Articles

Bilateral Simultaneous Cochlear Implants: How Early Activation Influences Wearing Hours.

Tawakkul Q, Almuhawas F, Alarifi S, Fatani N, Hagr A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941630 PMC: 11818215. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030961.


Some Challenging Questions About Outcomes in Children With Cochlear Implants.

Sehgal S, Castellanos I, Kronenberger W, Pisoni D Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2025; 9(6):1691-1696.

PMID: 39830449 PMC: 11741186. DOI: 10.1044/2024_persp-24-00094.


Frequency-to-Place Mismatch and Cochlear Implant Outcomes by Electrode Type.

DeFreese A, Berg K, Noble J, Dawant B, Holder J, Amberg S JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 151(2):135-142.

PMID: 39666319 PMC: 11826361. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4158.


Investigating the effect of cochlear implant usage metrics on cortical auditory-evoked potential responses in adult recipients post-implantation.

Bogdanov C, Goulios H, Mulders W, Tavora-Vieira D Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1453274.

PMID: 39640296 PMC: 11619141. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1453274.


CROS or hearing aid? Selecting the ideal solution for unilateral CI patients with limited aidable hearing in the contralateral ear.

Lively S, Agrawal S, Stewart M, Dwyer R, Strobel L, Marcinkevich P PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0293811.

PMID: 38394286 PMC: 10890777. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293811.


References
1.
Holden L, Finley C, Firszt J, Holden T, Brenner C, Potts L . Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2013; 34(3):342-60. PMC: 3636188. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7. View

2.
Sorkin D . Cochlear implantation in the world's largest medical device market: utilization and awareness of cochlear implants in the United States. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013; 14 Suppl 1:S4-12. PMC: 3663290. DOI: 10.1179/1467010013z.00000000076. View

3.
Chakravorti S, Noble J, Gifford R, Dawant B, OConnell B, Wang J . Further Evidence of the Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Electrode Positioning and Hearing Outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2019; 40(5):617-624. PMC: 6788798. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002204. View

4.
Spahr A, Dorman M, Litvak L, Van Wie S, Gifford R, Loizou P . Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear. 2011; 33(1):112-7. PMC: 4643855. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549. View

5.
Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C . Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear. 2006; 27(6):714-31. PMC: 2651401. DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000246816.50820.42. View