» Articles » PMID: 38314892

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Pediatric Unilateral Hearing Loss: Impact of Device Use and Direct Input

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2024 Feb 5
PMID 38314892
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of daily cochlear implant (CI) use on speech perception outcomes among children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL).

Study Design: Multi-institutional retrospective case series of pediatric patients with UHL who underwent CI between 2018 to 2022.

Setting: Three tertiary children's hospitals.

Methods: Demographics were obtained including duration of deafness and age at CI. Best consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word scores and data logs describing hours of CI usage were assessed postimplantation. Use of direct audio input (DAI) during rehabilitation was recorded.

Results: Twenty-seven children were included, with a mean age at CI of 7.8 years. Mean datalogging time was 7.8 ± 3.0 hours/day. 40.7% of children utilized daily DAI. The mean CNC score using the best score during the study period was 34.9%. There was no significant correlation between hours of CI usage and CNC score. There was a significant improvement in CNC score associated with whether the child used DAI during rehabilitation (CNC 50.91% [yes] vs 23.81% [no]), which remained significant when adjusting for age at CI, duration of deafness, and data log hours.

Conclusion: Unlike children with bilateral hearing loss and CI, children with UHL and CI demonstrate no significant correlation between hours of daily CI usage and CNC scores. However, children who used DAI during postoperative rehabilitation achieved significantly higher CNC scores than those who did not. This suggests that rehabilitation focused on isolated listening with the implanted ear maybe critical in optimizing outcomes with CI in UHL patients.

Citing Articles

Brazilian Society of Otology task force - single sided deafness - recommendations based on strength of evidence.

Tsuji R, Hamerschmidt R, Lavinsky J, Felix F, Silva V Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 91(1):101514.

PMID: 39378663 PMC: 11492085. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101514.

References
1.
Gagnon E, Eskridge H, Brown K, Park L . The Impact of Cumulative Cochlear Implant Wear Time on Spoken Language Outcomes at Age 3 Years. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; 64(4):1369-1375. PMC: 8608196. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00567. View

2.
Zeitler D, Sladen D, DeJong M, Torres J, Dorman M, Carlson M . Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 118:128-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.037. View

3.
Zeitler D, Dorman M . Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness: A New Treatment Paradigm. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019; 80(2):178-186. PMC: 6438794. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677482. View

4.
Ma C, Fried J, Nguyen S, Schvartz-Leyzac K, Camposeo E, Meyer T . Longitudinal Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2022; 133(5):1014-1024. DOI: 10.1002/lary.30354. View

5.
Benchetrit L, Ronner E, Anne S, Cohen M . Cochlear Implantation in Children With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 147(1):58-69. PMC: 7645748. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3852. View