» Articles » PMID: 38361477

Relationships Between Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Short Form SSQ12 Item Scores and Their Use in Guiding Rehabilitation for Cochlear Implant Recipients

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2024 Feb 16
PMID 38361477
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cochlear implantation successfully improves hearing in most adult recipients. However, in rare cases, post-implant rehabilitation is required to maximize benefit. The primary aim of this investigation was to test if self-reports by cochlear implant users indicate the need for post-implant rehabilitation. Listening performance was assessed with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities short-form SSQ12, which was self-administered via a web-based survey. Subjects included over 2000 adult bilateral or unilateral cochlear implant users with at least one year of experience. A novel application of regression tree analysis identified core SSQ12 items that serve as first steps in establishing a plan for further rehabilitation: items 1, 8, and 11 dealing with single-talker situations, loudness perception, and clarity, respectively. Further regression and classification tree analyses revealed that SSQ12 item scores were weakly related to age, degree of tinnitus, and use of bilateral versus unilateral implants. Conversely, SSQ12 scores were strongly associated with self-rated satisfaction and confidence in using their cochlear implant. The SSQ12 total scores did not vary significantly over 1-9 or more years' experience. These findings suggest that the SSQ12 may be a useful tool to guide rehabilitation at any time after cochlear implantation. Identification of poor performance may have implications for timely management to improve the outcomes, through various techniques such as device fitting adjustments, counseling, active sound exposure, and training spatial hearing.

References
1.
Assouly K, Arts R, Graham P, van Dijk B, James C . Influence of tinnitus annoyance on hearing-related quality of life in cochlear implant recipients. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):14423. PMC: 9402917. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18823-3. View

2.
Vannson N, James C, Fraysse B, Strelnikov K, Barone P, Deguine O . Quality of life and auditory performance in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol. 2015; 20 Suppl 1:38-43. DOI: 10.1159/000380746. View

3.
Kelly T, Tolson D, Day T, McColgan G, Kroll T, Maclaren W . Older people's views on what they need to successfully adjust to life with a hearing aid. Health Soc Care Community. 2013; 21(3):293-302. PMC: 3712468. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12016. View

4.
Canete O, Marfull D, Torrente M, Purdy S . The Spanish 12-item version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (Sp-SSQ12): adaptation, reliability, and discriminant validity for people with and without hearing loss. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 44(8):1419-1426. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1795279. View

5.
Holder J, Gifford R . Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; 64(10):4044-4055. PMC: 9132064. DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00066. View