The Carbon Footprint of Cataract Surgery in Wellington
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Introduction: Efforts to improve the sustainability of ophthalmic care require methods to measure its environmental impact and a baseline measurement to compare against in the future. We aimed to measure the carbon footprint of cataract surgery in Wellington.
Methods: We used Eyefficiency, an application using established footprinting methods, to estimate the emissions produced by phacoemulsification surgery in two public and two private hospitals. We measured (1) power consumption, (2) procurement of disposable items and pharmaceuticals, (3) waste disposal emissions and (4) travel (other potential sources were excluded). Where possible we used New Zealand emissions coefficients.
Results: We recorded data from 142 cataract surgeries. The average emissions produced by cataract surgery in the region was estimated to be 152kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. This is equivalent to 62L of petrol and would take 45m2 of forest one year to absorb. The great majority of emissions were from procurement, mostly disposable materials, and the second greatest contribution was from travel (driving).
Conclusion: Estimating the carbon footprint of cataract surgery is becoming easier, but improved methods for measuring the footprint of procured supplies are needed. There are significant opportunities for emissions reduction in the most common surgical procedure in New Zealand.
Patients' perspective on the environmental impact of the severe dry eye disease healthcare pathway.
Latham S, Boddy L, McClay T, Airaldi M, Borgia A, Cordos A Eye (Lond). 2025; .
PMID: 40089624 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03747-9.
The future of cataract surgery.
OBrart D Eye (Lond). 2025; .
PMID: 40082703 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03745-x.
AlHilali S, Bin Helayel H, Al-Swailem S Clin Ophthalmol. 2025; 19:713-720.
PMID: 40034213 PMC: 11874953. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S511472.
Waste and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Produced from Ophthalmic Surgeries: A Scoping Review.
Morris B, Tauber J, Rai A, Thiel C, Geringer T, Mian U Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1).
PMID: 39857505 PMC: 11765210. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010051.
The carbon footprint and energy consumption of liver transplantation.
De Simone P, Lai Q, Ducci J, Campani D, Biancofiore G Front Transplant. 2025; 3():1441928.
PMID: 39835249 PMC: 11743657. DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1441928.