» Articles » PMID: 39310357

Environmental Sustainability Initiatives in the Operating Room: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Open
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Sep 23
PMID 39310357
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The global healthcare industry has a substantial environmental footprint and therefore has a responsibility to decrease its impact. Changes to increase sustainability will only occur if healthcare providers (HCPs) and decision-makers understand and incorporate environmentally conscious practices in the operating room (OR). This scoping review aimed to assess hospital initiatives undertaken to support environmental sustainability in the OR, with a focus on HCP and hospital decision-maker beliefs and perceptions related to sustainability. A scoping review was conducted using Embase and PubMed. Searches were performed to identify relevant studies published between January 2011 and November 2022. A total of 163 publications were included: 10 systematic literature reviews and 153 original research articles. Most studies reported department-wide sustainability measures (waste reduction, staff education, etc), which were evaluated by the reduction in generated waste and energy, emission of greenhouse gasses, and costs. Despite up to 97% of HCPs noting willingness to improve sustainability within practices, up to 80.9% of HCPs stated that they lacked the necessary training and information. In conclusion, this research highlights a recent increase in interest about sustainability initiatives in the OR and that HCPs and surgical staff are not only willing to participate but also have suggestions on how to minimize the environmental impact of the OR.

References
1.
Kagoma Y, Stall N, Rubinstein E, Naudie D . People, planet and profits: the case for greening operating rooms. CMAJ. 2012; 184(17):1905-11. PMC: 3503903. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.112139. View

2.
Kaplan S, Sadler B, Little K, Franz C, Orris P . Can sustainable hospitals help bend the health care cost curve?. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012; 29:1-14. View

3.
Ard Jr J, Tobin K, Huncke T, Kline R, Ryan S, Bell C . A Survey of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Regarding Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, and Organization. A A Case Rep. 2015; 6(7):208-16. DOI: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000184. View

4.
Boussuge-Roze J, Boveda S, Mahida S, Anic A, Conte G, Chun J . Current practices and expectations to reduce environmental impact of electrophysiology catheters: results from an EHRA/LIRYC European physician survey. Europace. 2022; 24(8):1300-1306. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac085. View

5.
Power N, Silberstein J, Ghoneim T, Guillonneau B, Touijer K . Environmental impact of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: an estimate of the carbon dioxide footprint. J Endourol. 2012; 26(12):1639-44. PMC: 3521130. DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0298. View