The Carbon Footprint and Energy Consumption of Liver Transplantation

Overview

Journal Front Transplant

Date 2025 Jan 21

PMID 39835249

Authors

Paolo De Simone

Quirino Lai

Juri Ducci

Daniela Campani

Giandomenico Biancofiore

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Aims: There is growing interest in the environmental impact of surgical procedures, yet more information is needed specifically regarding liver transplantation. This study aims to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, or carbon footprint, associated with adult whole-size liver transplantation from donors after brain death, including the relevant back-table graft preparation.

Methods: The carbon footprint was calculated retrospectively using a bottom-up approach. This approach sums the volumes of energy consumption (kWh), volatile anesthetics (ml), solid waste (kg), and units of blood products transfused for each transplant. These consumption values were converted using validated conversion factors to the equivalent mass of carbon dioxide released into the environment (kg CO2e).

Results: A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 55 years (male, 78.9%) who underwent liver transplants between 2021 and 2022 were analyzed, resulting in 45.5 tons CO2e. The mean (SD) carbon footprint for each procedure was 309.8 (33.2) kg CO2e [95% CI: 304.4; 315.3]. Total energy power consumption was 96.5 MW, contributing 65.4% of greenhouse emissions (29.8 tons CO2e), while volatile anesthetics, solid waste, and blood product transfusions contributed 8.0% (3.64 tons CO2e), 5.9% (2.7 tons CO2e), and 20.6% (9.4 tons CO2e), respectively. The duration of surgery ( = 29.0; < 0.001), transfused red blood cells ( = 13.1; < 0.001), fresh frozen plasma ( = 11.1; < 0.001), platelets ( = 8.9; < 0.001), and the use of an extracorporeal pump machine ( = 3.6; < 0.001) had the greatest effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Conclusions: Liver transplantation requires significant energy and is associated with considerable greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during longer procedures. Transplant clinicians, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients should be aware of the environmental impact of liver transplantation and collaborate to adopt sustainable energy practices.

References

Harries L, Schrem H, Stahmeyer J, Krauth C, Amelung V . High resource utilization in liver transplantation-how strongly differ costs between the care sectors and what are the main cost drivers?: a retrospective study. Transpl Int. 2017; 30(6):621-637. DOI: 10.1111/tri.12950. View

Rodriguez-Jimenez L, Romero-Martin M, Spruell T, Steley Z, Gomez-Salgado J . The carbon footprint of healthcare settings: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2023; 79(8):2830-2844. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15671. View

Rizan C . Environmental impact of hybrid (reusable/single-use) ports versus single-use equivalents in robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):155. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01899-6. View

Kunnen Y, Roemeling O, Smailhodzic E . What are barriers and facilitators in sustaining lean management in healthcare? A qualitative literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):958. PMC: 10483794. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09978-4. View

McGain F, Muret J, Lawson C, Sherman J . Environmental sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(5):680-692. PMC: 7421303. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.055. View

Anastasopoulos N, Papalois V . Environmentally sustainable kidney care through transplantation: Current status and future challenges. Surgeon. 2024; 22(4):233-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2024.01.001. View

Wyssusek K, Chan K, Eames G, Whately Y . Greenhouse gas reduction in anaesthesia practice: a departmental environmental strategy. BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(3). PMC: 9413181. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001867. View

Talbot S, Moore D . Waste management in the operating theatre. Surgeon. 2024; 22(4):248-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2024.06.004. View

Hubert J, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli L, Wang A, Toledo E, Ferrufino R, Smalls K . Carbon emissions during elective coronary artery bypass surgery, a single center experience. J Clin Anesth. 2022; 80:110850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110850. View

10.

Perez-Calatayud A, Hofmann A, Perez-Ferrer A, Escorza-Molina C, Torres-Perez B, Zaccarias-Ezzat J . Patient Blood Management in Liver Transplant-A Concise Review. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(4). PMC: 10135593. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11041093. View

11.

Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Ball S, Bell S, Bellamy R . Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet. 2009; 373(9676):1693-733. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1. View

12.

Ghinolfi D, Lai Q, Pezzati D, De Simone P, Rreka E, Filipponi F . Use of Elderly Donors in Liver Transplantation: A Paired-match Analysis at a Single Center. Ann Surg. 2017; 268(2):325-331. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002305. View

13.

Chauvet P, Enguix A, Sautou V, Slim K . A systematic review comparing the safety, cost and carbon footprint of disposable and reusable laparoscopic devices. J Visc Surg. 2024; 161(2S):25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.10.006. View

14.

Grinberg D, Buzzi R, Pozzi M, Schweizer R, Capsal J, Thinot B . Eco-audit of conventional heart surgery procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021; 60(6):1325-1331. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab320. View

15.

Watts N, Adger W, Agnolucci P, Blackstock J, Byass P, Cai W . Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health. Lancet. 2015; 386(10006):1861-914. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60854-6. View

16.

Rizan C, Lillywhite R, Reed M, Bhutta M . The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes. J R Soc Med. 2023; 116(6):199-213. PMC: 10331364. DOI: 10.1177/01410768231166135. View

17.

Barnett J, Vasileiou K, Djemil F, Brooks L, Young T . Understanding innovators' experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11:342. PMC: 3265424. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-342. View

18.

Amariglio A, Depaoli D . Waste management in an Italian Hospital's operating theatres: An observational study. Am J Infect Control. 2020; 49(2):184-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.07.013. View

19.

Wall A, Borries T, Reddy V, Asrani S, Testa G, Trotter J . The carbon footprint of organ acquisition in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22(12):3184-3185. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17196. View

20.

Rizan C, Bhutta M . Environmental impact and life cycle financial cost of hybrid (reusable/single-use) instruments versus single-use equivalents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021; 36(6):4067-4078. PMC: 9085686. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08728-z. View