» Articles » PMID: 34504207

Biomechanical Effects of Lumbar Fusion Surgery on Adjacent Segments Using Musculoskeletal Models of the Intact, Degenerated and Fused Spine

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Sep 10
PMID 34504207
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adjacent segment disorders are prevalent in patients following a spinal fusion surgery. Postoperative alterations in the adjacent segment biomechanics play a role in the etiology of these conditions. While experimental approaches fail to directly quantify spinal loads, previous modeling studies have numerous shortcomings when simulating the complex structures of the spine and the pre/postoperative mechanobiology of the patient. The biomechanical effects of the L4-L5 fusion surgery on muscle forces and adjacent segment kinetics (compression, shear, and moment) were investigated using a validated musculoskeletal model. The model was driven by in vivo kinematics for both preoperative (intact or severely degenerated L4-L5) and postoperative conditions while accounting for muscle atrophies. Results indicated marked changes in the kinetics of adjacent L3-L4 and L5-S1 segments (e.g., by up to 115% and 73% in shear loads and passive moments, respectively) that depended on the preoperative L4-L5 disc condition, postoperative lumbopelvic kinematics and, to a lesser extent, postoperative changes in the L4-L5 segmental lordosis and muscle injuries. Upper adjacent segment was more affected post-fusion than the lower one. While these findings identify risk factors for adjacent segment disorders, they indicate that surgical and postoperative rehabilitation interventions should focus on the preservation/restoration of patient's normal segmental kinematics.

Citing Articles

Viscoelastic Hydrogel Promotes Disc Mechanical Homeostasis Repair and Delays Intervertebral Disc Degeneration via the Yes-Associated Protein Pathway.

Yu Z, Wu K, Fan C, Wang J, Chu F, He W Biomater Res. 2025; 29:0150.

PMID: 40040957 PMC: 11876543. DOI: 10.34133/bmr.0150.


The Association Between Adjacent Forces and the Development of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Musculoskeletal Analysis.

Alavi F, Nielsen C, Lewis S, Rampersaud R, Cheung A Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251321789.

PMID: 40017048 PMC: 11869222. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251321789.


Biomechanical Evaluation of the Effect of MIS and COS Surgical Techniques on Patients with Spondylolisthesis using a Musculoskeletal Model.

Azizi S, Nikkhoo M, Rostami M, Cheng C J Biomed Phys Eng. 2025; 15(1):49-66.

PMID: 39975524 PMC: 11833159. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2406-1781.


Comparison of Clinical Efficacy in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, and Hybrid Surgery.

Zhu Z, Xuan A, Xu C, Wang C, He Q, Tang L Int J Spine Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 39667791 PMC: 11687063. DOI: 10.14444/8659.


Effect of Lumbar Spinal Stabilization Exercises Along With Neural Tissue Mobilization on Pain and Spinal Dysfunction in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Dhake P, Shinde S, Aphale S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72396.

PMID: 39583442 PMC: 11586110. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72396.


References
1.
Huang Y, Du C, Cheng C, Zhong Z, Chen X, Wu G . Preserving Posterior Complex Can Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries: A Finite Element Analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0166452. PMC: 5117648. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166452. View

2.
Khoddam-Khorasani P, Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A . Effect of changes in the lumbar posture in lifting on trunk muscle and spinal loads: A combined in vivo, musculoskeletal, and finite element model study. J Biomech. 2020; 104:109728. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109728. View

3.
Yee T, Terman S, La Marca F, Park P . Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2014; 21(10):1796-801. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.010. View

4.
Guanciale A, Dinsay J, WATKINS R . Lumbar lordosis in spinal fusion. A comparison of intraoperative results of patient positioning on two different operative table frame types. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(8):964-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199604150-00012. View

5.
Lee S, Daffner S, Wang J, Davis B, Alanay A, Kim J . The change of whole lumbar segmental motion according to the mobility of degenerated disc in the lower lumbar spine: a kinetic MRI study. Eur Spine J. 2014; 24(9):1893-900. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3277-z. View