» Articles » PMID: 34497447

Establishment and Validation of a Computer-assisted Colonic Polyp Localization System Based on Deep Learning

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy is an emerging field, and its application may help colonoscopists improve inspection quality and reduce the rate of missed polyps and adenomas. Several deep learning-based computer-assisted detection (CADe) techniques were established from small single-center datasets, and unrepresentative learning materials might confine their application and generalization in wide practice. Although CADes have been reported to identify polyps in colonoscopic images and videos in real time, their diagnostic performance deserves to be further validated in clinical practice.

Aim: To train and test a CADe based on multicenter high-quality images of polyps and preliminarily validate it in clinical colonoscopies.

Methods: With high-quality screening and labeling from 55 qualified colonoscopists, a dataset consisting of over 71000 images from 20 centers was used to train and test a deep learning-based CADe. In addition, the real-time diagnostic performance of CADe was tested frame by frame in 47 unaltered full-ranged videos that contained 86 histologically confirmed polyps. Finally, we conducted a self-controlled observational study to validate the diagnostic performance of CADe in real-world colonoscopy with the main outcome measure of polyps per colonoscopy in Changhai Hospital.

Results: The CADe was able to identify polyps in the test dataset with 95.0% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity. For colonoscopy videos, all 86 polyps were detected with 92.2% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity in frame-by-frame analysis. In the prospective validation, the sensitivity of CAD in identifying polyps was 98.4% (185/188). Folds, reflections of light and fecal fluid were the main causes of false positives in both the test dataset and clinical colonoscopies. Colonoscopists can detect more polyps (0.90 0.82, < 0.001) and adenomas (0.32 0.30, = 0.045) with the aid of CADe, particularly polyps < 5 mm and flat polyps (0.65 0.57, < 0.001; 0.74 0.67, = 0.001, respectively). However, high efficacy is not realized in colonoscopies with inadequate bowel preparation and withdrawal time ( = 0.32; = 0.16, respectively).

Conclusion: CADe is feasible in the clinical setting and might help endoscopists detect more polyps and adenomas, and further confirmation is warranted.

Citing Articles

AI support for colonoscopy quality control using CNN and transformer architectures.

Chen J, Wang G, Zhou J, Zhang Z, Ding Y, Xia K BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):257.

PMID: 39123140 PMC: 11316311. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03354-0.


Non-polypoid Colorectal Lesions Detection and False Positive Detection by Artificial Intelligence under Blue Laser Imaging and Linked Color Imaging.

Sugino S, Yoshida N, Guo Z, Zhang R, Inoue K, Hirose R J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024; 8(3):212-220.

PMID: 39086882 PMC: 11286363. DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2023-070.


Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of chronic atrophic gastritis in endoscopy.

Shi Y, Wei N, Wang K, Wu J, Tao T, Li N Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1122247.

PMID: 36950553 PMC: 10025314. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1122247.


Mucosal imaging in colon polyps: New advances and what the future may hold.

Young E, Rajandran A, Philpott H, Sathananthan D, Hoile S, Singh R World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 28(47):6632-6661.

PMID: 36620337 PMC: 9813932. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6632.


Real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy improves adenoma detection rates even in experienced endoscopists: a cohort study in Singapore.

Koh F, Ladlad J, Teo E, Lin C, Foo F Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(1):165-171.

PMID: 35882667 PMC: 9321269. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09470-w.

References
1.
Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, Xia T, Chang X, Yang X . Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156(6):1661-1674.e11. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260. View

2.
Chen P, Lin M, Lai M, Lin J, Lu H, Tseng V . Accurate Classification of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Computer-Aided Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017; 154(3):568-575. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.010. View

3.
Wang P, Berzin T, Glissen Brown J, Bharadwaj S, Becq A, Xiao X . Real-time automatic detection system increases colonoscopic polyp and adenoma detection rates: a prospective randomised controlled study. Gut. 2019; 68(10):1813-1819. PMC: 6839720. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500. View

4.
Bernal J, Tajkbaksh N, Sanchez F, Matuszewski B, Chen H, Yu L . Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results From the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017; 36(6):1231-1249. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042. View

5.
Wang P, Liu X, Berzin T, Glissen Brown J, Liu P, Zhou C . Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 5(4):343-351. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30411-X. View