» Articles » PMID: 29928897

Deep Learning Localizes and Identifies Polyps in Real Time With 96% Accuracy in Screening Colonoscopy

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2018 Jun 22
PMID 29928897
Citations 211
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: The benefit of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention depends on the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The ADR should reflect the adenoma prevalence rate, which is estimated to be higher than 50% in the screening-age population. However, the ADR by colonoscopists varies from 7% to 53%. It is estimated that every 1% increase in ADR lowers the risk of interval colorectal cancers by 3%-6%. New strategies are needed to increase the ADR during colonoscopy. We tested the ability of computer-assisted image analysis using convolutional neural networks (CNNs; a deep learning model for image analysis) to improve polyp detection, a surrogate of ADR.

Methods: We designed and trained deep CNNs to detect polyps using a diverse and representative set of 8,641 hand-labeled images from screening colonoscopies collected from more than 2000 patients. We tested the models on 20 colonoscopy videos with a total duration of 5 hours. Expert colonoscopists were asked to identify all polyps in 9 de-identified colonoscopy videos, which were selected from archived video studies, with or without benefit of the CNN overlay. Their findings were compared with those of the CNN using CNN-assisted expert review as the reference.

Results: When tested on manually labeled images, the CNN identified polyps with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 and an accuracy of 96.4%. In the analysis of colonoscopy videos in which 28 polyps were removed, 4 expert reviewers identified 8 additional polyps without CNN assistance that had not been removed and identified an additional 17 polyps with CNN assistance (45 in total). All polyps removed and identified by expert review were detected by the CNN. The CNN had a false-positive rate of 7%.

Conclusion: In a set of 8,641 colonoscopy images containing 4,088 unique polyps, the CNN identified polyps with a cross-validation accuracy of 96.4% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991. The CNN system detected and localized polyps well within real-time constraints using an ordinary desktop machine with a contemporary graphics processing unit. This system could increase the ADR and decrease interval colorectal cancers but requires validation in large multicenter trials.

Citing Articles

Deep learning in nuclear medicine: from imaging to therapy.

Zhang M, Liu P, Zhang M, Su P, Shang H, Zhu J Ann Nucl Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40080372 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-025-02031-w.


A unified framework harnessing multi-scale feature ensemble and attention mechanism for gastric polyp and protrusion identification in gastroscope imaging.

He C, Zhang J, Liang Y, Li H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5734.

PMID: 39962226 PMC: 11833082. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90034-y.


Disparity in endoscopic localisation of early distal colorectal cancers: a retrospective cohort analysis from a single institution.

Sukumar A, Zaman S, Mostafa O, Patel J, Akingboye A, Waterland P Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):68.

PMID: 39945868 PMC: 11825640. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03642-7.


Using a Mobile Health App (ColonClean) to Enhance the Effectiveness of Bowel Preparation: Development and Usability Study.

Chen H, Tu M, Chen M JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12():e58479.

PMID: 39791869 PMC: 11735013. DOI: 10.2196/58479.


Artificial intelligence algorithms for real-time detection of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a review.

Nie M, An X, Xing Y, Wang Z, Wang Y, Lu J Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(11):5456-5470.

PMID: 39659923 PMC: 11626263. DOI: 10.62347/BZIZ6358.


References
1.
Kaminski M, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Kraszewska E . Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Gastroenterology. 2017; 153(1):98-105. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.006. View

2.
Anderson J, Butterly L . Colonoscopy: quality indicators. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015; 6:e77. PMC: 4418496. DOI: 10.1038/ctg.2015.5. View

3.
Hassan C, Senore C, Radaelli F, De Pretis G, Sassatelli R, Arrigoni A . Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme. Gut. 2016; 66(11):1949-1955. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311906. View

4.
Silver D, Huang A, Maddison C, Guez A, Sifre L, Van Den Driessche G . Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature. 2016; 529(7587):484-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature16961. View

5.
Bernal J, Tajkbaksh N, Sanchez F, Matuszewski B, Chen H, Yu L . Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results From the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017; 36(6):1231-1249. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2664042. View