» Articles » PMID: 34495965

An Integrated Framework for Building Trustworthy Data-driven Epidemiological Models: Application to the COVID-19 Outbreak in New York City

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Sep 8
PMID 34495965
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epidemiological models can provide the dynamic evolution of a pandemic but they are based on many assumptions and parameters that have to be adjusted over the time the pandemic lasts. However, often the available data are not sufficient to identify the model parameters and hence infer the unobserved dynamics. Here, we develop a general framework for building a trustworthy data-driven epidemiological model, consisting of a workflow that integrates data acquisition and event timeline, model development, identifiability analysis, sensitivity analysis, model calibration, model robustness analysis, and projection with uncertainties in different scenarios. In particular, we apply this framework to propose a modified susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered (SEIR) model, including new compartments and model vaccination in order to project the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in New York City (NYC). We find that we can uniquely estimate the model parameters and accurately project the daily new infection cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, in agreement with the available data from NYC's government's website. In addition, we employ the calibrated data-driven model to study the effects of vaccination and timing of reopening indoor dining in NYC.

Citing Articles

Optimal time-dependent SUC model for COVID-19 pandemic in India.

Hwang Y, Kwak S, Jyoti , Kim J BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):1031.

PMID: 39333900 PMC: 11429571. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09961-2.


Emergence of the reproduction matrix in epidemic forecasting.

Gorji H, Stauffer N, Lunati I J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(216):20240124.

PMID: 39081116 PMC: 11289658. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0124.


A computational approach to identifiability analysis for a model of the propagation and control of COVID-19 in Chile.

Burger R, Chowell G, Kroker I, Lara-Diaz L J Biol Dyn. 2023; 17(1):2256774.

PMID: 37708159 PMC: 10620014. DOI: 10.1080/17513758.2023.2256774.


Study of optimal vaccination strategies for early COVID-19 pandemic using an age-structured mathematical model: A case study of the USA.

Luebben G, Gonzalez-Parra G, Cervantes B Math Biosci Eng. 2023; 20(6):10828-10865.

PMID: 37322963 PMC: 11216547. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023481.


Uncertainty quantification in mechanistic epidemic models via cross-entropy approximate Bayesian computation.

Cunha Jr A, Barton D, Ritto T Nonlinear Dyn. 2023; 111(10):9649-9679.

PMID: 37025428 PMC: 9961307. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-023-08327-8.


References
1.
Ligon T, Frohlich F, Chis O, Banga J, Balsa-Canto E, Hasenauer J . GenSSI 2.0: multi-experiment structural identifiability analysis of SBML models. Bioinformatics. 2017; 34(8):1421-1423. PMC: 5905618. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx735. View

2.
Yang Z, Zeng Z, Wang K, Wong S, Liang W, Zanin M . Modified SEIR and AI prediction of the epidemics trend of COVID-19 in China under public health interventions. J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(3):165-174. PMC: 7139011. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.64. View

3.
Horwitz L, Jones S, Cerfolio R, Francois F, Greco J, Rudy B . Trends in COVID-19 Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates. J Hosp Med. 2020; 16(2):90-92. DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3552. View

4.
Tuncer N, Le T . Structural and practical identifiability analysis of outbreak models. Math Biosci. 2018; 299:1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.02.004. View

5.
Holmdahl I, Buckee C . Wrong but Useful - What Covid-19 Epidemiologic Models Can and Cannot Tell Us. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(4):303-305. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2016822. View