» Articles » PMID: 34478446

Inter-trial Effects in Priming of Pop-out: Comparison of Computational Updating Models

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Sep 3
PMID 34478446
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In visual search tasks, repeating features or the position of the target results in faster response times. Such inter-trial 'priming' effects occur not just for repetitions from the immediately preceding trial but also from trials further back. A paradigm known to produce particularly long-lasting inter-trial effects-of the target-defining feature, target position, and response (feature)-is the 'priming of pop-out' (PoP) paradigm, which typically uses sparse search displays and random swapping across trials of target- and distractor-defining features. However, the mechanisms underlying these inter-trial effects are still not well understood. To address this, we applied a modeling framework combining an evidence accumulation (EA) model with different computational updating rules of the model parameters (i.e., the drift rate and starting point of EA) for different aspects of stimulus history, to data from a (previously published) PoP study that had revealed significant inter-trial effects from several trials back for repetitions of the target color, the target position, and (response-critical) target feature. By performing a systematic model comparison, we aimed to determine which EA model parameter and which updating rule for that parameter best accounts for each inter-trial effect and the associated n-back temporal profile. We found that, in general, our modeling framework could accurately predict the n-back temporal profiles. Further, target color- and position-based inter-trial effects were best understood as arising from redistribution of a limited-capacity weight resource which determines the EA rate. In contrast, response-based inter-trial effects were best explained by a bias of the starting point towards the response associated with a previous target; this bias appeared largely tied to the position of the target. These findings elucidate how our cognitive system continually tracks, and updates an internal predictive model of, a number of separable stimulus and response parameters in order to optimize task performance.

Citing Articles

Computational modelling reveals the influence of object similarity and proximity on visually guided movements.

Patil M, Heinke D, Zhang F PeerJ. 2025; 13:e18953.

PMID: 40028223 PMC: 11869896. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18953.


Distractor-response binding influences visual search.

Allenmark F, Yu H, Muller H, Shi Z, Frings C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(2):316-333.

PMID: 39904933 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03016-7.


How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning.

Heitmeier M, Chuang Y, Baayen R Cogn Psychol. 2023; 146:101598.

PMID: 37716109 PMC: 10589761. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598.


Continuous action with a neurobiologically inspired computational approach reveals the dynamics of selection history.

Makwana M, Zhang F, Heinke D, Song J PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(7):e1011283.

PMID: 37459378 PMC: 10374010. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011283.


Multisensory visuo-tactile context learning enhances the guidance of unisensory visual search.

Chen S, Shi Z, Muller H, Geyer T Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):9439.

PMID: 33941832 PMC: 8093296. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88946-6.

References
1.
Yu A, Cohen J . Sequential effects: Superstition or rational behavior?. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015; 21:1873-1880. PMC: 4580342. View

2.
Gold J, Shadlen M . Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001; 5(1):10-16. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01567-9. View

3.
Gokce A, Muller H, Geyer T . Positional priming of pop-out is nested in visuospatial context. J Vis. 2013; 13(3):32. DOI: 10.1167/13.3.32. View

4.
Found A, Muller H . Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Percept Psychophys. 1996; 58(1):88-101. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205479. View

5.
Gokce A, Geyer T, Finke K, Muller H, Tollner T . What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: insights from event-related EEG lateralizations. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:688. PMC: 4078256. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00688. View