» Articles » PMID: 18505321

Electrophysiological Markers of Visual Dimension Changes and Response Changes

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2008 May 29
PMID 18505321
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In cross-dimensional visual search tasks, target discrimination is faster when the previous trial contained a target defined in the same visual dimension as the current trial. The dimension-weighting account (DWA; A. Found & H. J. Müller, 1996) explains this intertrial facilitation by assuming that visual dimensions are weighted at an early perceptual stage of processing. Recently, this view has been challenged by models claiming that intertrial facilitation effects are generated at later stages that follow attentional target selection (K. Mortier, J. Theeuwes, & P. A. Starreveld, 2005). To determine whether intertrial facilitation is generated at a perceptual stage, at the response selection stage, or both, the authors focused on specific event-related brain potential components (directly linkable to perceptual and response-related processing) during a compound search task. Visual dimension repetitions were mirrored by shorter latencies and enhanced amplitudes of the N2-posterior- contralateral, suggesting a facilitated allocation of attentional resources to the target. Response repetitions and changes systematically modulated the lateralized readiness potential amplitude, suggesting a benefit from residual activations of the previous trial biasing the correct response. Overall, the present findings strengthen the DWA by indicating a perceptual origin of dimension change costs in visual search.

Citing Articles

Distractor-response binding influences visual search.

Allenmark F, Yu H, Muller H, Shi Z, Frings C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(2):316-333.

PMID: 39904933 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-025-03016-7.


Top-down instructions influence the attentional weight on color and shape dimensions during bidimensional search.

Xu Z, Lleras A, Gong Z, Buetti S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):31376.

PMID: 39732851 PMC: 11682205. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82866-x.


Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli.

Mandal A, Liesefeld A, Liesefeld H J Neurosci. 2024; 44(30.

PMID: 38886058 PMC: 11270513. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2196-23.2024.


The time course of feature-selective attention inside and outside the focus of spatial attention.

Andersen S, Hillyard S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(16):e2309975121.

PMID: 38588433 PMC: 11032453. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309975121.


Saccadic landing positions reveal that eye movements are affected by distractor-based retrieval.

Schopper L, Lappe M, Frings C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(7):2219-2235.

PMID: 35978216 PMC: 9481505. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02538-8.


References
1.
Chun M, Wolfe J . Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?. Cogn Psychol. 1996; 30(1):39-78. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0002. View

2.
Eimer M . The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996; 99(3):225-34. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9. View

3.
Cohen A, Magen H . Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets. Percept Psychophys. 1999; 61(2):291-307. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206889. View

4.
Found A, Muller H . Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Percept Psychophys. 1996; 58(1):88-101. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205479. View

5.
Mortier K, Theeuwes J, Starreveld P . Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005; 31(3):542-57. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.542. View