» Articles » PMID: 34447111

Influence of Implant Angulation and Implant Number on the Accuracy of Definitive Casts

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Aug 27
PMID 34447111
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The present study determined the effect of implant angulation and implant number on the dimensional precision of implant definitive casts.

Materials And Methods: Three definitive casts with implant analogs placed in a triangular pattern were made from dental stone. Group I was control group, Group II in which implant numbers 1 and 3 were at 5° convergence to the implant number 2. Group III in which implant numbers 1 and 3 are at 5° divergence to the implant number 2. Group IV in which implant numbers 1 and 3 are at 10° convergence to the implant number 2. Implant analogs were secured in all the definitive casts with cyanoacrylate. Three open tray impressions of the definitive cast were obtained and poured in Type IV dental stone. Coordinates in the three planes were measured at implant analog top surface and base of the cast using a fine tip measuring stylus. The data were aligned and angular differences between implant analog vectors from definitive and duplicate casts were measured.

Results: There was a significant correlation between dental implant number and dental implant angulation ( < 0.05). There was a significant result when comparing the effect of the parallel group from 5° divergence and 10° convergence groups. A significant results while comparing the parallel group with 5° divergence and 10° convergence was obtained whereas while comparing 5° divergence, 5° divergence, and 10° convergence a nonsignificant difference was obtained ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: Close proximity of implant angulation toward right-angled direction results in higher precision of implant.

Citing Articles

Effect of different fabrication workflows on the passive fit of screw-retained bar splinting two interforaminal implants: a parallel blinded randomised clinical trial.

Eldin B, Talaat I, Nawar N, Mohamed A BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):410.

PMID: 38566034 PMC: 10985940. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04157-1.

References
1.
Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G . In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83(5):562-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70015-1. View

2.
Carr A . Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6(4):448-55. View

3.
Assuncao W, Filho H, Zaniquelli O . Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent. 2004; 13(4):358-66. DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000144509.58901.f7. View

4.
Kohavi D . A combined impression technique for a partial implant-supported fixed-detachable restoration. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28(3):177-81. View

5.
Martinez-Rus F, Garcia C, Santamaria A, Ozcan M, Pradies G . Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels. Implant Dent. 2013; 22(3):268-76. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182920dc5. View