» Articles » PMID: 23615660

Accuracy of Definitive Casts Using 4 Implant-level Impression Techniques in a Scenario of Multi-implant System with Different Implant Angulations and Subgingival Alignment Levels

Overview
Journal Implant Dent
Date 2013 Apr 26
PMID 23615660
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of various implant-level impression techniques on the accuracy of definitive casts for a multiple internal connection implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival depths.

Material And Methods: Six tapered Screw-Vent implants were placed in a reference model with different angles (0, 15, and 30 degrees) and subgingival positions (0, 1, and 3 mm). Twenty medium-consistency polyether impressions of this model were made with 4 techniques (n = 5 per group): (1) indirect technique, (2) unsplinted direct technique, (3) acrylic resin-splinted direct technique, and (4) metal-splinted direct technique. Impressions were poured with type IV dental stone. The interimplant distances were measured for casts using a coordinate measuring machine and the deviations compared with the reference model were calculated. Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient, ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α = 0.05).

Results: Four impression procedures showed significant differences (P = 0.0001). Only group 4 casts showed no significant differences in comparison with the reference model (P = 0.666) (ANOVA repeated measures).

Conclusions: The impression procedure affected the accuracy of definitive casts. The metal-splinted direct technique produced the most accurate casts, followed by acrylic resin-splinted direct, indirect, and unsplinted direct techniques.

Citing Articles

Effect of soft tissue thickness on accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques.

Awad E, ElSheikh M, El-Segai A BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1318.

PMID: 39478512 PMC: 11523802. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05037-4.


The Accuracy of Casts Obtained Using Different Impression Techniques and Impression Materials in Combined Parallel and Angulated Implants: An In Vitro Study.

V M, Chirom B, Gunadhar K, Priyadarshini S, Nongthombam R, P M Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e59193.

PMID: 38807829 PMC: 11131036. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59193.


The Technique and Material Used to Join Transfers Affect the Accuracy and Final Fit of Implant-Supported Prostheses-In Vitro Study.

Mariotto G, Detogni A, Persh M, Sinhoreti M, Camilotti V, Mendonca M Eur J Dent. 2024; 18(4):1040-1047.

PMID: 38806161 PMC: 11479725. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779422.


Evaluation of the Stability of Open-Tray Impression Coping Using Two Different Impression Materials at Three Different Subgingival Implant Placement Depths.

P M G, Sukumaran K, K H, Ravindran S Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e61117.

PMID: 38803409 PMC: 11129605. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61117.


Comparative evaluation of open tray impression technique: investigating the precision of four splinting materials in multiple implants.

Patil P, Madhav V, Alshadidi A, Saini R, Aldosari L, Heboyan A BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):844.

PMID: 37940890 PMC: 10633989. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03583-x.