» Articles » PMID: 34372582

Cysteine Mutations in the Ebolavirus Matrix Protein VP40 Promote Phosphatidylserine Binding by Increasing the Flexibility of a Lipid-Binding Loop

Overview
Journal Viruses
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Aug 10
PMID 34372582
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ebolavirus (EBOV) is a negative-sense RNA virus that causes severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. The matrix protein VP40 facilitates viral budding by binding to lipids in the host cell plasma membrane and driving the formation of filamentous, pleomorphic virus particles. The C-terminal domain of VP40 contains two highly-conserved cysteine residues at positions 311 and 314, but their role in the viral life cycle is unknown. We therefore investigated the properties of VP40 mutants in which the conserved cysteine residues were replaced with alanine. The C311A mutation significantly increased the affinity of VP40 for membranes containing phosphatidylserine (PS), resulting in the assembly of longer virus-like particles (VLPs) compared to wild-type VP40. The C314A mutation also increased the affinity of VP40 for membranes containing PS, albeit to a lesser degree than C311A. The double mutant behaved in a similar manner to the individual mutants. Computer modeling revealed that both cysteine residues restrain a loop segment containing lysine residues that interact with the plasma membrane, but Cys has the dominant role. Accordingly, the C311A mutation increases the flexibility of this membrane-binding loop, changes the profile of hydrogen bonding within VP40 and therefore binds to PS with greater affinity. This is the first evidence that mutations in VP40 can increase its affinity for biological membranes and modify the length of Ebola VLPs. The Cys and Cys residues therefore play an important role in dynamic interactions at the plasma membrane by modulating the ability of VP40 to bind PS.

Citing Articles

Ebola Virus Matrix Protein VP40 Single Mutations G198R and G201R Significantly Enhance Plasma Membrane Localization.

Cioffi M, Sharma T, Motsa B, Bhattarai N, Gerstman B, Stahelin R J Phys Chem B. 2024; 128(46):11335-11344.

PMID: 39326870 PMC: 11586905. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c02700.


Computational and experimental identification of keystone interactions in Ebola virus matrix protein VP40 dimer formation.

Narkhede Y, Saxena R, Sharma T, Conarty J, Ramirez V, Motsa B Protein Sci. 2024; 33(5):e4978.

PMID: 38591637 PMC: 11002992. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4978.


Minor changes in electrostatics robustly increase VP40 membrane binding, assembly, and budding of Ebola virus matrix protein derived virus-like particles.

Motsa B, Sharma T, Chapagain P, Stahelin R bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38352396 PMC: 10862912. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.30.578092.


Phosphatidylserine clustering by the Ebola virus matrix protein is a critical step in viral budding.

Husby M, Amiar S, Prugar L, David E, Plescia C, Huie K EMBO Rep. 2022; 23(11):e51709.

PMID: 36094794 PMC: 9638875. DOI: 10.15252/embr.202051709.

References
1.
Timmins J, Scianimanico S, Schoehn G, Weissenhorn W . Vesicular release of ebola virus matrix protein VP40. Virology. 2001; 283(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1006/viro.2001.0860. View

2.
Adu-Gyamfi E, Digman M, Gratton E, Stahelin R . Single-particle tracking demonstrates that actin coordinates the movement of the Ebola virus matrix protein. Biophys J. 2012; 103(9):L41-3. PMC: 3491695. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.09.026. View

3.
Kugelman J, Kugelman-Tonos J, Ladner J, Pettit J, Keeton C, Nagle E . Emergence of Ebola Virus Escape Variants in Infected Nonhuman Primates Treated with the MB-003 Antibody Cocktail. Cell Rep. 2015; 12(12):2111-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.038. View

4.
Adu-Gyamfi E, Johnson K, Fraser M, Scott J, Soni S, Jones K . Host Cell Plasma Membrane Phosphatidylserine Regulates the Assembly and Budding of Ebola Virus. J Virol. 2015; 89(18):9440-53. PMC: 4542376. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01087-15. View

5.
Jo S, Kim T, Iyer V, Im W . CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J Comput Chem. 2008; 29(11):1859-65. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20945. View