» Articles » PMID: 34301629

Genome-wide Variability in Recombination Activity is Associated with Meiotic Chromatin Organization

Overview
Journal Genome Res
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Jul 24
PMID 34301629
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recombination enables reciprocal exchange of genomic information between parental chromosomes and successful segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Errors in this process lead to negative health outcomes, whereas variability in recombination rate affects genome evolution. In mammals, most crossovers occur in hotspots defined by PRDM9 motifs, although PRDM9 binding peaks are not all equally hot. We hypothesize that dynamic patterns of meiotic genome folding are linked to recombination activity. We apply an integrative bioinformatics approach to analyze how three-dimensional (3D) chromosomal organization during meiosis relates to rates of double-strand-break (DSB) and crossover (CO) formation at PRDM9 binding peaks. We show that active, spatially accessible genomic regions during meiotic prophase are associated with DSB-favored loci, which further adopt a transient locally active configuration in early prophase. Conversely, crossover formation is depleted among DSBs in spatially accessible regions during meiotic prophase, particularly within gene bodies. We also find evidence that active chromatin regions have smaller average loop sizes in mammalian meiosis. Collectively, these findings establish that differences in chromatin architecture along chromosomal axes are associated with variable recombination activity. We propose an updated framework describing how 3D organization of brush-loop chromosomes during meiosis may modulate recombination.

Citing Articles

Dynamic changes in histone lysine lactylation during meiosis prophase I in mouse spermatogenesis.

Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(7):e2418693122.

PMID: 39928879 PMC: 11848400. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2418693122.


Chromatin Topological Domains Associate With the Rapid Formation of Tandem Duplicates in Plants.

Ma N, Li X, Ci D, Zeng H, Zhang C, Xie X Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 12(7):e2408861.

PMID: 39731323 PMC: 11831494. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202408861.


Chromosome architecture and homologous recombination in meiosis.

Ito M, Shinohara A Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 10:1097446.

PMID: 36684419 PMC: 9853400. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1097446.


Deep learning identifies and quantifies recombination hotspot determinants.

Li Y, Chen S, Rapakoulia T, Kuwahara H, Yip K, Gao X Bioinformatics. 2022; 38(10):2683-2691.

PMID: 35561158 PMC: 9113300. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac234.


losses in vertebrates are coupled to those of paralogs and .

Cavassim M, Baker Z, Hoge C, Schierup M, Schumer M, Przeworski M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(9).

PMID: 35217607 PMC: 8892340. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2114401119.


References
1.
Kent W, Zweig A, Barber G, Hinrichs A, Karolchik D . BigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(17):2204-7. PMC: 2922891. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq351. View

2.
Nambiar M, Smith G . Repression of harmful meiotic recombination in centromeric regions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 54:188-97. PMC: 4867242. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.042. View

3.
Wang Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, Du Z, Si W, Fan S . Reprogramming of Meiotic Chromatin Architecture during Spermatogenesis. Mol Cell. 2019; 73(3):547-561.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.019. View

4.
Beliveau B, Boettiger A, Avendano M, Jungmann R, McCole R, Joyce E . Single-molecule super-resolution imaging of chromosomes and in situ haplotype visualization using Oligopaint FISH probes. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:7147. PMC: 4430122. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8147. View

5.
Walker M, Billings T, Baker C, Powers N, Tian H, Saxl R . Affinity-seq detects genome-wide PRDM9 binding sites and reveals the impact of prior chromatin modifications on mammalian recombination hotspot usage. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015; 8:31. PMC: 4562113. DOI: 10.1186/s13072-015-0024-6. View