» Articles » PMID: 34256184

The Accuracy of Heartbeat Detection Using Photoplethysmography Technology in Cardiac Patients

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 13
PMID 34256184
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Photoplethysmography (PPG) in wearable sensors potentially plays an important role in accessible heart rhythm monitoring. We investigated the accuracy of a state-of-the-art bracelet (Corsano 287) for heartbeat detection in cardiac patients and evaluated the efficacy of a signal qualifier in identifying medically useful signals.

Methods: Patients from an outpatient cardiology clinic underwent a simultaneous resting ECG and PPG recording, which we compared to determine accuracy of the PPG sensor for detecting heartbeats within 100 and 50 ms of the ECG-detected heart beats and correlation and Limits of Agreement for heartrate (HR) and RR-intervals. We defined subgroups for skin type, hair density, age, BMI and gender and applied a previously described signal qualifier.

Results: In 180 patients 7914 ECG-, and 7880 (99%) PPG-heartbeats were recorded. The PPG-accuracy within 100 ms was 94.6% (95% CI 94.1-95.1) and 89.2% (95% CI 88.5-89.9) within 50 ms. Correlation was high for HR (R = 0.991 (95% CI 0.988-0.993), n = 180) and RR-intervals (R = 0.891 (95% CI 0.886-0.895), n = 7880). The 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) were -3.89 to 3.77 (mean bias 0.06) beats per minute for HR and -173 to 171 (mean bias -1) for RR-intervals. Results were comparable across all subgroups. The signal qualifier led to a higher accuracy in a 100 ms range (98.2% (95% CI 97.9-98.5)) (n = 143).

Conclusion: We showed that the Corsano 287 Bracelet with PPG-technology can determine HR and RR-intervals with high accuracy in cardiovascular at-risk patient population among different subgroups, especially with a signal quality indicator.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic accuracy of ECG smart chest patches versus PPG smartwatches for atrial fibrillation detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sibomana O, Hakayuwa C, Obianke A, Gahire H, Munyantore J, Chilala M BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):132.

PMID: 40000931 PMC: 11853970. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04582-2.


Performance of a medical smartband with photoplethysmography technology and artificial intelligence algorithm to detect atrial fibrillation.

Blok S, Gielen W, Piek M, Hoeksema W, Tulevski I, Somsen G Mhealth. 2025; 11:5.

PMID: 39944860 PMC: 11811644. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-10.


Vital signs-based healthcare kiosks for screening chronic and infectious diseases: a systematic review.

Bhutani S, Alian A, Fletcher R, Bomberg H, Eichenberger U, Menon C Commun Med (Lond). 2025; 5(1):28.

PMID: 39837977 PMC: 11751283. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-025-00738-5.


Multicenter Evaluation of Machine-Learning Continuous Pulse Rate Algorithm on Wrist-Worn Device.

Chen W, Cordero R, Lever Taylor J, Pangallo D, Picard R, Cruz M Digit Biomark. 2024; 8(1):218-228.

PMID: 39670276 PMC: 11637493. DOI: 10.1159/000542615.


Evaluation of photoplethysmography-based monitoring of pulse rate, interbeat-intervals, and oxygen saturation during high-intensity interval training.

Vijgeboom T, Muller M, Ebrahimkheil K, van Eijck C, Ronner E Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):114.

PMID: 39529038 PMC: 11552347. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01309-w.