» Articles » PMID: 34254673

Long-term Safety of Adjunctive Cenobamate in Patients with Uncontrolled Focal Seizures: Open-label Extension of a Randomized Clinical Study

Overview
Journal Epilepsia
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Jul 13
PMID 34254673
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to examine long-term (up to 7.8 years) retention rate, safety, and tolerability of the antiseizure medication (ASM) cenobamate as adjunctive treatment in the open-label extension (OLE) of study YKP3089C013 (C013; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01397968).

Methods: Patients who completed the 12-week, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled C013 study, which examined adjunctive cenobamate treatment of adults with uncontrolled focal seizures, were eligible to enroll in the OLE. During the OLE, dose adjustments of cenobamate and concomitant ASMs were allowed. Safety assessments included frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs, TEAE severity, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Probability of patient continuation in the OLE was examined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: One hundred forty-nine patients entered the OLE (median duration of cenobamate treatment = 6.25 years). As of the data cutoff, 57% of patients (85/149) remained in the OLE (median treatment duration = 6.8 years, range = 6.4-7.8 years). The median modal daily cenobamate dose was 200 mg (range = 50-400 mg). The probability of treatment continuation at 1-6 years of cenobamate treatment was 73%, 67%, 63%, 61%, 60%, and 59%, respectively. Among patients who continued at 1 year (n = 107), the probability of continuing at Years 2-5 was 92%, 87%, 83%, and 82%. The most common discontinuation reasons were patient withdrawal (19.5%, 29/149), adverse event (10.1%, 15/149), and lack of efficacy (5.4%, 8/149). TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 1% or more of patients were fatigue (1.3%, 2/149), ataxia (1.3%, 2/149), and memory impairment or amnesia (1.3%, 2/149). Dizziness (32.9%, 49/149), headache (26.8%, 40/149), and somnolence (21.5%, 32/149) were the most frequently reported TEAEs and were primarily mild or moderate in severity.

Significance: Long-term retention in the C013 OLE study demonstrated sustained safety and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate treatment up to 7.8 years in adults with treatment-resistant focal seizures taking one to three ASMs.

Citing Articles

Exploring the Effectiveness of Adjunctive Cenobamate in Focal Epilepsy: A Time-Based Analysis.

Roberti R, Di Gennaro G, Cianci V, DAniello A, Di Bonaventura C, Di Gennaro G CNS Drugs. 2025; .

PMID: 40016473 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01166-8.


Cenobamate, a New Promising Antiseizure Medication: Experimental and Clinical Aspects.

Blaszczyk B, Czuczwar S, Miziak B Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684724 PMC: 11640885. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252313014.


Cenobamate as an Early Adjunctive Treatment in Drug-Resistant Focal-Onset Seizures: An Observational Cohort Study.

Winter Y, Abou Dargham R, Patino Tobon S, Groppa S, Fuest S CNS Drugs. 2024; 38(9):733-742.

PMID: 39096467 PMC: 11316687. DOI: 10.1007/s40263-024-01109-9.


Therapeutic strategies during cenobamate treatment initiation: Delphi panel recommendations.

Steinhoff B, Ben-Menachem E, Klein P, Peltola J, Schmitz B, Thomas R Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024; 17:17562864241256733.

PMID: 38883228 PMC: 11179501. DOI: 10.1177/17562864241256733.


The cenobamate KORK study-A prospective monocenter observational study investigating cenobamate as an adjunctive therapy in refractory epilepsy, with comparisons to historical cohorts treated with add-on lacosamide, perampanel, and brivaracetam.

Steinhoff B, Georgiou D, Intravooth T Epilepsia Open. 2024; 9(4):1502-1514.

PMID: 38861254 PMC: 11296107. DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12992.


References
1.
Mohanraj R, Brodie M . Measuring the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs. Seizure. 2003; 12(7):413-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1059-1311(03)00047-5. View

2.
Toledo M, Beale R, Evans J, Steeves S, Elmoufti S, Townsend R . Long-term retention rates for antiepileptic drugs: A review of long-term extension studies and comparison with brivaracetam. Epilepsy Res. 2017; 138:53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.008. View

3.
Ben-Menachem E, Gabbai A, Hufnagel A, Maia J, Almeida L, Soares-da-Silva P . Eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive therapy in adult patients with partial epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2010; 89(2-3):278-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.01.014. View

4.
Rosenfeld W, Fountain N, Kaubrys G, Ben-Menachem E, McShea C, Isojarvi J . Safety and efficacy of adjunctive lacosamide among patients with partial-onset seizures in a long-term open-label extension trial of up to 8 years. Epilepsy Behav. 2014; 41:164-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.074. View

5.
Fisher R, Cross J, French J, Higurashi N, Hirsch E, Jansen F . Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017; 58(4):522-530. DOI: 10.1111/epi.13670. View