» Articles » PMID: 34246272

TELD with Limited Foraminoplasty Has Potential Biomechanical Advantages over TELD with Large Annuloplasty: an In-silico Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2021 Jul 11
PMID 34246272
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Facetectomy, an important procedure in the in-out and out-in techniques of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD), is related to the deterioration of the postoperative biomechanical environment and poor prognosis. Facetectomy may be avoided in TELD with large annuloplasty, but iatrogenic injury of the annulus and a high grade of nucleotomy have been reported as risk factors influencing poor prognosis. These risk factors may be alleviated in TELD with limited foraminoplasty, and the grade of facetectomy in this surgery can be reduced by using an endoscopic dynamic drill.

Methods: An intact lumbo-sacral finite element (FE) model and the corresponding model with adjacent segment degeneration were constructed and validated to evaluate the risk of biomechanical deterioration and related postoperative complications of TELD with large annuloplasty and TELD with limited foraminoplasty. Changes in various biomechanical indicators were then computed to evaluate the risk of postoperative complications in the surgical segment.

Results: Compared with the intact FE models, the model of TELD with limited foraminoplasty demonstrated slight biomechanical deterioration, whereas the model of TELD with large annuloplasty revealed obvious biomechanical deterioration. Degenerative changes in adjacent segments magnified, rather than altered, the overall trends of biomechanical change.

Conclusions: TELD with limited foraminoplasty presents potential biomechanical advantages over TELD with large annuloplasty. Iatrogenic injury of the annulus and a high grade of nucleotomy are risk factors for postoperative biomechanical deterioration and complications of the surgical segment.

Citing Articles

Posterior Ligamentum Complex Preservation Alleviate ASD-Related Biomechanical Deterioration in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Models: A Finite Element Analysis.

He L, Zhu T, Cai W, Yang W, Chen Z, Li J JOR Spine. 2025; 8(1):e70030.

PMID: 39781090 PMC: 11705535. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70030.


Extending the intermedullary nail will not reduce the potential risk of femoral head varus in PFNA patients biomechanically: a clinical review and corresponding numerical simulation.

Cha X, Zhou Q, Li J, Xu H, Xu W, Li J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):405.

PMID: 38783225 PMC: 11112938. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07334-z.


Intraoperative capsule protection can reduce the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration acceleration biomechanically: an in silico study.

Huang F, Huang G, Jia J, Lu S, Li J J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):143.

PMID: 38365801 PMC: 10870541. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04550-0.


Biomechanical Evaluation of 2 Endoscopic Spine Surgery Methods for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Finite Element Study.

Zou Y, Ji S, Yang H, Ma T, Fang Y, Wang Z Neurospine. 2024; 21(1):273-285.

PMID: 38317559 PMC: 10992651. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347076.538.


Stability simulation analysis of targeted puncture in L4/5 intervertebral space for PELD surgery.

Liu Y, Zhang Q, Ji N, Wang J, Li J, Du J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 11:1298914.

PMID: 38260730 PMC: 10800398. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1298914.


References
1.
Park P, Garton H, Gala V, Hoff J, McGillicuddy J . Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(17):1938-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137069.88904.03. View

2.
Xin G, Shi-Sheng H, Hai-Long Z . Morphometric analysis of the YESS and TESSYS techniques of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Clin Anat. 2013; 26(6):728-34. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22286. View

3.
Yang J, Guo C, Kong Q, Zhang B, Wang Y, Zhang L . Learning curve and clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Int Orthop. 2019; 44(2):309-317. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-019-04448-1. View

4.
Mochida J, Nishimura K, Nomura T, Toh E, Chiba M . The importance of preserving disc structure in surgical approaches to lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(13):1556-63; discussion 1563-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199607010-00014. View

5.
Meakin J, Hukins D . Effect of removing the nucleus pulposus on the deformation of the annulus fibrosus during compression of the intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 2000; 33(5):575-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00215-8. View