» Articles » PMID: 38217013

Comparison of Bone Reamer and Trephine for Foraminoplasty in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Based on 3D Slicer and Digimizer Software

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Jan 12
PMID 38217013
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the applicability of bone reamer and trephine for foraminoscopy in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), and to provide a theoretical basis for foraminoplasty options in clinical practice.

Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study. Sixty-three consecutive patients who underwent PELD for lumbar disc herniation between May 2021 and July 2022 were analysed. Foraminoplasty were performed by bone reamer or trephine. The amount of bone removed and the foramen area enlarged during foraminoplasty by both tools were measured by 3D slicer and Digimizer software, and the numbers of fluoroscopic views were recorded.

Results: The bone reamer removed less bone in the Superior Articular Process (SAP) than the trephine (t = 17.507, P < 0.001), and the area enlarged by the bone reamer was smaller than that of the trephine (t = 10.042, P = 0.002). The overall numbers of fluoroscopic views were significantly more in the bone reamer group than in the trephine group (t = 19.003, P < 0.001). In the bone reamer group, when the area of preoperative (FPZ) was no less than 54.55 mm, the mean number of fluoroscopic views significantly decreased (t = 14.443, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Bone reamer was safer and trephine was more efficient for foraminoscopy in PELD. An area of preoperative (FPZ) of 54.55 mm can be used as a critical value: bone reamer reduced the risk for cases above the value, while trephine improved the efficiency for cases less than the value.

References
1.
Choi K, Park C . Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation: Consideration of the Relation between the Iliac Crest and L5-S1 Disc. Pain Physician. 2016; 19(2):E301-8. View

2.
Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, Ramirez A . Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(24):E890-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245955.22358.3a. View

3.
Yu Y, Jiang Y, Xu F, Mao Y, Yuan L, Li C . A novel vertebral trench technique (VTT) involving transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) for very highly up-migrated lumbar disc herniation above L5. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):693. PMC: 8364045. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04548-3. View

4.
Yu Z, Lu Y, Li Y, An Y, Wang B . A one-step foraminoplasty via a large trephine in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0268564. PMC: 9128989. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268564. View

5.
Zou H, Hu Y, Liu J, Wu J . Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy via Eccentric Trepan foraminoplasty Technology for Unilateral Stenosed Serve Root Canals. Orthop Surg. 2020; 12(4):1205-1211. PMC: 7454158. DOI: 10.1111/os.12739. View