» Articles » PMID: 34239497

Vagus Nerve Cross-Sectional Area in Patients With Parkinson's Disease-An Ultrasound Case-Control Study

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Jul 9
PMID 34239497
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vagal parasympathetic neurons are prone to degeneration in Parkinson's disease (PD). High-resolution ultrasound can precisely estimate the cross-sectional (CSA) area of peripheral nerves. Here, we tested the hypothesis that vagus CSA is reduced in PD. We included 56 healthy controls (HCs) and 63 patients with PD. Using a high-end ultrasound system equipped with a high-frequency transducer, five images were obtained of each nerve. The hypoechoic neuronal tissue was delineated offline with dedicated software and the CSA extracted. In the initial PD vs. HC comparison, no statistically significant differences were observed in mean left vagus CSA (HC: 1.97 mm, PD: 1.89 mm, = 0.36) nor in mean right vagus CSA (HC: 2.37 mm, PD: 2.23 mm, = 0.17). The right vagus CSA was significantly larger than the left vagus CSA in both groups ( < 0.0001). Females were overrepresented in the HC group and presented with generally smaller vagus CSAs. Consequently, sex-adjusted CSA was significantly smaller for the right vagus nerve of the PD group ( = 0.041), but not for the left. A small but significant reduction in sex-adjusted right vagus CSA was observed in patients with PD. The left vagus CSA was not significantly reduced in patients with PD. Ultrasound may not be a suitable method to detecting vagal axonal loss in individual patients.

Citing Articles

Comparison of vagus nerve cross-sectional area between brain-first and body-first Parkinson's disease.

Dong S, Shen B, Jiang X, Zhu J, Zhang H, Zhao Y NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024; 10(1):231.

PMID: 39639003 PMC: 11621687. DOI: 10.1038/s41531-024-00844-6.


Left Vagus Stimulation Modulates Contralateral Subthalamic β Power Improving the Gait in Parkinson's Disease.

Marano M, Anzini G, Saltarocchi L, Ricciuti R, Capone F, Tan H Mov Disord. 2023; 39(2):424-428.

PMID: 38111224 PMC: 7615838. DOI: 10.1002/mds.29690.


Ultrasound evaluation of vagus nerve cross-sectional area in a community-dwelling elderly Japanese cohort.

Oura K, Akasaka H, Ishizuka N, Sato Y, Kudo M, Yamaguchi T PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0280661.

PMID: 37200343 PMC: 10194966. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280661.


α-Synuclein induces prodromal symptoms of Parkinson's disease via activating TLR2/MyD88/NF-κB pathway in Schwann cells of vagus nerve in a rat model.

Cheng Y, Tong Q, Yuan Y, Song X, Jiang W, Wang Y J Neuroinflammation. 2023; 20(1):36.

PMID: 36788559 PMC: 9926693. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-023-02720-1.


Effect of Parkinson's Disease on Cardio-postural Coupling During Orthostatic Challenge.

Fadil R, Huether A, Verma A, Brunnemer R, Blaber A, Lou J Front Physiol. 2022; 13:863877.

PMID: 35755448 PMC: 9214860. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.863877.


References
1.
Seki A, Chen P, Fishbein M . Reply to the editor-does the cervical vagus contain sympathetic fibers that act on the heart?. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11(10):e79-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.009. View

2.
Kalaitzakis M, Graeber M, Gentleman S, Pearce R . The dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus is not an obligatory trigger site of Parkinson's disease: a critical analysis of alpha-synuclein staging. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2007; 34(3):284-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00923.x. View

3.
Knudsen K, Fedorova T, Hansen A, Sommerauer M, Otto M, Svendsen K . In-vivo staging of pathology in REM sleep behaviour disorder: a multimodality imaging case-control study. Lancet Neurol. 2018; 17(7):618-628. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30162-5. View

4.
Verlinden T, Rijkers K, Hoogland G, Herrler A . Morphology of the human cervical vagus nerve: implications for vagus nerve stimulation treatment. Acta Neurol Scand. 2015; 133(3):173-82. DOI: 10.1111/ane.12462. View

5.
Greene J . Causes and consequences of degeneration of the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve in Parkinson's disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014; 21(4):649-67. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2014.5859. View