» Articles » PMID: 34223526

XGBoost, a Machine Learning Method, Predicts Neurological Recovery in Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Journal Neurotrauma Rep
Date 2021 Jul 5
PMID 34223526
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The accurate prediction of neurological outcomes in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is difficult because of heterogeneity in patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and radiographic findings. Although machine learning algorithms may increase the accuracy of outcome predictions in various fields, limited information is available on their efficacy in the management of SCI. We analyzed data from 165 patients with cervical SCI, and extracted important factors for predicting prognoses. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) as a machine learning model was applied to assess the reliability of a machine learning algorithm to predict neurological outcomes compared with that of conventional methodology, such as a logistic regression or decision tree. We used regularly obtainable data as predictors, such as demographics, magnetic resonance variables, and treatment strategies. Predictive tools, including XGBoost, a logistic regression, and a decision tree, were applied to predict neurological improvements in the functional motor status (ASIA [American Spinal Injury Association] Impairment Scale [AIS] D and E) 6 months after injury. We evaluated predictive performance, including accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Regarding predictions of neurological improvements in patients with cervical SCI, XGBoost had the highest accuracy (81.1%), followed by the logistic regression (80.6%) and the decision tree (78.8%). Regarding AUC, the logistic regression showed 0.877, followed by XGBoost (0.867) and the decision tree (0.753). XGBoost reliably predicted neurological alterations in patients with cervical SCI. The utilization of predictive machine learning algorithms may enhance personalized management choices through pre-treatment categorization of patients.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic and prognostic capability of artificial intelligence in spinal cord injury: A systematic review.

Gill S, Subbiah Ponniah H, Giersztein S, Anantharaj R, Namireddy S, Killilea J Brain Spine. 2025; 5:104208.

PMID: 40027293 PMC: 11871462. DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104208.


Using Artificial Intelligence in the Comprehensive Management of Spinal Cord Injury.

Kim K, Jeong J, Ko M, Lee S, Kwon W, Lee B Korean J Neurotrauma. 2025; 20(4):215-224.

PMID: 39803338 PMC: 11711027. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e43.


An integrative nomogram based on MRI radiomics and clinical characteristics for prognosis prediction in cervical spinal cord Injury.

Zhang Z, Li N, Ding Y, Cheng H Eur Spine J. 2024; 34(3):1164-1176.

PMID: 39672993 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08609-8.


Machine learning approach to predict acute kidney injury among patients undergoing multi-level spinal posterior instrumented fusion.

Heo K, Rajan P, Khawaja S, Barber L, Yoon S J Spine Surg. 2024; 10(3):362-371.

PMID: 39399076 PMC: 11467292. DOI: 10.21037/jss-24-15.


A machine learning approach to predict foot care self-management in older adults with diabetes.

Ozgur S, Mum S, Benzer H, Toran M, Toygar I Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024; 16(1):244.

PMID: 39375790 PMC: 11457351. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-024-01480-z.


References
1.
Finkelstein J, Gangopadhyay A . Using machine learning to predict asthma exacerbations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008; :955. View

2.
Deyo R, Cherkin D, Ciol M . Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45(6):613-9. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8. View

3.
Deo R . Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation. 2015; 132(20):1920-30. PMC: 5831252. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593. View

4.
Hiremath S, Hogaboom N, Roscher M, Worobey L, Oyster M, Boninger M . Longitudinal Prediction of Quality-of-Life Scores and Locomotion in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(12):2385-2392. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.020. View

5.
Goulet J, Richard-Denis A, Mac-Thiong J . The use of classification and regression tree analysis to identify the optimal surgical timing for improving neurological outcomes following motor-complete thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2020; 58(6):682-688. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-0412-z. View