» Articles » PMID: 38847729

Prediction of Gait Recovery Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jun 7
PMID 38847729
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning (ML) has been widely applied to predict functional outcomes in clinical medicine. However, there has been no attempt to predict walking ability after spinal cord injury (SCI) based on ML. In this situation, the main purpose of this study was to predict gait recovery after SCI at discharge from an acute rehabilitation facility using various ML algorithms. In addition, we explored important variables that were related to the prognosis. Finally, we attempted to suggest an ML-based decision support system (DSS) for predicting gait recovery after SCI. Data were collected retrospectively from patients with SCI admitted to an acute rehabilitation facility between June 2008 to December 2021. Linear regression analysis and ML algorithms (random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], and support vector machine) were used to predict the functional ambulation category at the time of discharge (FAC_DC) in patients with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI (n = 353). The independent variables were age, sex, duration of acute care and rehabilitation, comorbidities, neurological information entered into the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI worksheet, and somatosensory-evoked potentials at the time of admission to the acute rehabilitation facility. In addition, the importance of variables and DT-based DSS for FAC_DC was analyzed. As a result, RF and DT accurately predicted the FAC_DC measured by the root mean squared error. The root mean squared error of RF and the DT were 1.09 and 1.24 for all participants, 1.20 and 1.06 for those with trauma, and 1.12 and 1.03 for those with non-trauma, respectively. In the analysis of important variables, the initial FAC was found to be the most influential factor in all groups. In addition, we could provide a simple DSS based on strong predictors such as the initial FAC, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades, and neurological level of injury. In conclusion, we provide that ML can accurately predict gait recovery after SCI for the first time. By focusing on important variables and DSS, we can guide early prognosis and establish personalized rehabilitation strategies in acute rehabilitation hospitals.

Citing Articles

Multicenter study on predicting postoperative upper limb muscle strength improvement in cervical spinal cord injury patients using radiomics and deep learning.

Lin F, Wang K, Lai M, Wu Y, Chen C, Wang Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5805.

PMID: 39962172 PMC: 11833087. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72539-0.


Using Artificial Intelligence in the Comprehensive Management of Spinal Cord Injury.

Kim K, Jeong J, Ko M, Lee S, Kwon W, Lee B Korean J Neurotrauma. 2025; 20(4):215-224.

PMID: 39803338 PMC: 11711027. DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2024.20.e43.


Predictors of Early Mortality After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa.

Jacob A, Wirtz C, Loibl M, Kruger S, Blankson B, Dunn R Global Spine J. 2024; :21925682241300269.

PMID: 39523107 PMC: 11561959. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241300269.


Towards Transforming Neurorehabilitation: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurological Disorders.

Calderone A, Latella D, Bonanno M, Quartarone A, Mojdehdehbaher S, Celesti A Biomedicines. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39457727 PMC: 11504847. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12102415.

References
1.
New P, Cripps R, Bonne Lee B . Global maps of non-traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository. Spinal Cord. 2013; 52(2):97-109. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.165. View

2.
Holden M, Gill K, Magliozzi M, Nathan J . Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984; 64(1):35-40. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35. View

3.
DeVries Z, Hoda M, Rivers C, Maher A, Wai E, Moravek D . Development of an unsupervised machine learning algorithm for the prognostication of walking ability in spinal cord injury patients. Spine J. 2019; 20(2):213-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.007. View

4.
Kato C, Uemura O, Sato Y, Tsuji T . Functional Outcome Prediction After Spinal Cord Injury Using Ensemble Machine Learning. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023; 105(1):95-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.011. View

5.
Wilson J, Cadotte D, Fehlings M . Clinical predictors of neurological outcome, functional status, and survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 17(1 Suppl):11-26. DOI: 10.3171/2012.4.AOSPINE1245. View