» Articles » PMID: 12163735

Sagittal Alignment of Cervical Flexion and Extension: Lateral Radiographic Analysis

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2002 Aug 7
PMID 12163735
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: An analysis of lateral radiographs in the upright, flexion-extension position.

Objectives: To document and define the differences in cervical flexion-extension kinematics as they relate to changes of alignment in upright cervical lordosis.

Summary Of Background Data: No previous study has reported the association between sagittal plane cervical rotation kinematics and changes of alignment in upright cervical lordosis.

Methods: Lateral radiographs were classified into five groups (Group A, lordosis; Group B, straight; Group C, kyphosis; Group D, S-curve with lordotic upper cervical and kyphotic lower cervical spine; and Group E, S-curve with kyphotic upper cervical and lordotic lower cervical spine) by changes of alignment in upright position. Sagittal cervical rotation angles were measured by a computer-assisted method in the fully flexed and extended positions.

Results: Group A revealed the largest angle of lordosis at extension and the smallest angle of kyphosis at flexion, whereas Group C revealed the smallest angle of lordosis at extension and the largest angle of kyphosis at flexion. When Group D adopted the flexion-extension position, the curvature of the upper cervical spine was the same as Group A, whereas the lower cervical spine showed the same curve as Group C. Similarly, the cervical rotation kinematics in Group E were a combination of motion of upper cervical spine in Group C and that of lower spine in Group A.

Conclusion: The results suggest that alterations in the static alignment of the cervical curvature cause alterations in the dynamic kinematics of the cervical spine during cervical flexion-extension. This information should aid in the interpretation of kinematic studies of the cervical spine.

Citing Articles

The effect of cervical spine flexion-extension motion on odontoid parameters.

Huang L, Liu D, Xu H, Feng J, Kang T, Wei S J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):68.

PMID: 39828697 PMC: 11743038. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05488-7.


A novel classification that defines the normal cervical spine: an analysis based on 632 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers.

Zhang Z, Wang J, Ge R, Guo C, Liang Y, Liu H Eur Spine J. 2023; 33(1):155-165.

PMID: 37880410 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07997-7.


The Effect of Subsidence on Segmental and Global Lordosis at Long-term Follow-up After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Duey A, Gonzalez C, Geng E, Ferriter Jr P, Rosenberg A, Isleem U Neurospine. 2023; 19(4):927-934.

PMID: 36597631 PMC: 9816598. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244750.375.


Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine: radiographic analysis of 111 asymptomatic adolescents, a retrospective observational study.

Zhu Y, Zhang X, Fan Y, Zhou Z, Gu G, Wang C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):840.

PMID: 36057594 PMC: 9440571. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05792-x.


Disc Height Narrowing Could Not Stabilize the Mobility at the Level of Cervical Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study of 83 Patients with Cervical Single-Level Spondylolisthesis.

Aoyama R, Yamane J, Ninomiya K, Takahashi Y, Kitamura K, Nori S Asian Spine J. 2022; 17(1):138-148.

PMID: 35815353 PMC: 9977987. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2021.0207.