» Articles » PMID: 34183417

How Both Partners' Individual Differences, Stress, and Behavior Predict Change in Relationship Satisfaction: Extending the VSA Model

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Jun 29
PMID 34183417
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We pooled data from 10 longitudinal studies of 1,104 married couples to test the Vulnerability-Stress-Adaptation (VSA) model of change in relationship satisfaction. Studies contained both spouses' self-reports of neuroticism, attachment anxiety, and attachment avoidance; observational measures of engagement and opposition during problem-solving discussions at baseline; and repeated reports of both spouses' stress and marital satisfaction over several years. Consistent with the VSA model, all three individual and partner qualities predicted changes in marital satisfaction that were mediated by observations of behavior and moderated by both partners' experiences with stress. In contrast to the VSA model, however, rather than accentuating the association between individual differences and behavior, both partners' stress moderated the strength, and even direction, of the association between behavior and changes in marital satisfaction over time. Taken together, these findings indicate that 1) qualities of both couple members shape their behavioral exchanges, 2) these behaviors explain how individuals and their partners' enduring qualities predict relationship satisfaction, and 3) stress experienced by both couple members strongly determines how enduring qualities and behavior predict changes in relationship satisfaction over time. The complex interplay among both partners' enduring qualities, stress, and behavior helps explain why studies may fail to document direct main effects of own and partner enduring qualities and behavior on changes in relationship satisfaction over time.

Citing Articles

Dyadic Analysis of Cumulative Childhood Trauma and Relationship Satisfaction: The Role of Parental Alliance.

Baumann M, Villeneuve E, Belanger C, Paradis A, Herba C, Godbout N J Marital Fam Ther. 2025; 51(2):e70002.

PMID: 39902820 PMC: 11792431. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.70002.


The explanatory role of psychological distress in the link between role blurring and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic study.

Lagace M, Lachance-Grzela M, Ross-Plourde M, Brassard A J Marital Fam Ther. 2024; 51(1):e12753.

PMID: 39648359 PMC: 11625984. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12753.


Dyadic Moderators of the Minority Stress-HIV Risk Association in Male Couples.

Smith M, Sarno E, Price C, Sajwani A, Mustanski B, Newcomb M AIDS Behav. 2024; 28(6):2023-2033.

PMID: 38489139 PMC: 11235382. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04303-4.


Intimate Partner Violence Risk Factors: A Vulnerability-Adaptation Stress Model Approach.

Brunton R, Dryer R J Interpers Violence. 2024; 39(15-16):3738-3763.

PMID: 38409776 PMC: 11283747. DOI: 10.1177/08862605241234352.


Sexual growth and destiny beliefs: Longitudinal associations with dyadic coping among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction.

Rossi M, Peloquin K, Allsop D, El Amiri S, Bouzayen R, Brassard A J Sex Med. 2023; 20(10):1241-1251.

PMID: 37632412 PMC: 10545535. DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad098.


References
1.
Robles T, Slatcher R, Trombello J, McGinn M . Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2013; 140(1):140-187. PMC: 3872512. DOI: 10.1037/a0031859. View

2.
Nguyen T, Karney B, Bradbury T . When poor communication does and does not matter: The moderating role of stress. J Fam Psychol. 2020; 34(6):676-686. PMC: 7438248. DOI: 10.1037/fam0000643. View

3.
Ein-Dor T, Mikulincer M, Shaver P . Attachment insecurities and the processing of threat-related information: Studying the schemas involved in insecure people's coping strategies. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011; 101(1):78-93. DOI: 10.1037/a0022503. View

4.
Lavner J, Karney B, Bradbury T . Does Couples' Communication Predict Marital Satisfaction, or Does Marital Satisfaction Predict Communication?. J Marriage Fam. 2016; 78(3):680-694. PMC: 4852543. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12301. View

5.
Joel S, Eastwick P, Allison C, Arriaga X, Baker Z, Bar-Kalifa E . Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(32):19061-19071. PMC: 7431040. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917036117. View