» Articles » PMID: 27152050

Does Couples' Communication Predict Marital Satisfaction, or Does Marital Satisfaction Predict Communication?

Overview
Journal J Marriage Fam
Date 2016 May 7
PMID 27152050
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The quality of communication between spouses is widely assumed to affect their subsequent judgments of relationship satisfaction, yet this assumption is rarely tested against the alternative prediction that communication is merely a consequence of spouses' prior levels of satisfaction. To evaluate these perspectives, newlywed couples' positivity, negativity, and effectiveness were observed four times at 9-month intervals and these behaviors were examined in relation to corresponding self-reports of relationship satisfaction. Cross-sectionally, relatively satisfied couples engaged in more positive, less negative, and more effective communication. Longitudinally, reliable communication-to-satisfaction and satisfaction-to-communication associations were identified, yet neither pathway was particularly robust. These findings raise important doubts about theories and interventions that prioritize couple communication skills as the key predictor of relationship satisfaction, while raising new questions about other factors that might predict communication and satisfaction and that strengthen or moderate their association.

Citing Articles

Communication and sexual skills in marital functioning and satisfaction and reduced marital conflicts among Iranian couples: A systematic review.

Azarnik M, Rafeipour A, Hatami M, Mousavi M J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:202.

PMID: 39268441 PMC: 11392282. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1182_22.


Development and validation of the relational behavior interactions scale for couples.

Harel T, Koslowsky M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8086.

PMID: 38582916 PMC: 10998839. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58901-2.


Acceptability and feasibility of an intervention for Alaska Native and American Indian couples.

Avey J, Wark K, Andrews P, Donadio J, Bradbury T, Outten B Fam Relat. 2024; 73(1):298-317.

PMID: 38576473 PMC: 10989934. DOI: 10.1111/fare.12986.


A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.

Ryjova Y, Gold A, Timmons A, Han S, Chaspari T, Pettit C J Fam Psychol. 2024; 38(3):453-465.

PMID: 38252084 PMC: 10963157. DOI: 10.1037/fam0001180.


Theory of brain complexity and marital behaviors: The application of complexity science and neuroscience to explain the complexities of marital behaviors.

Nikrahan G Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1050164.

PMID: 36959907 PMC: 10027753. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1050164.


References
1.
Heavey C, Layne C, Christensen A . Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993; 61(1):16-27. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.16. View

2.
Rogge R, Cobb R, Lawrence E, Johnson M, Bradbury T . Is skills training necessary for the primary prevention of marital distress and dissolution? A 3-year experimental study of three interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013; 81(6):949-961. DOI: 10.1037/a0034209. View

3.
Williamson H, Bradbury T, Trail T, Karney B . Factor analysis of the Iowa family interaction rating scales. J Fam Psychol. 2011; 25(6):993-9. PMC: 7673103. DOI: 10.1037/a0025903. View

4.
Karney B, Bradbury T . Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997; 72(5):1075-92. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1075. View

5.
Karney B, Bradbury T . The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. Psychol Bull. 1995; 118(1):3-34. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3. View