» Articles » PMID: 23586411

When Low Self-esteem Encourages Behaviors That Risk Rejection to Increase Interdependence: the Role of Relational Self-construal [corrected]

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2013 Apr 17
PMID 23586411
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 104(6) of Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (see record 2013-18890-002). The title of the article is incorrect.] Increasing interdependence in an intimate relationship requires engaging in behaviors that risk rejection, such as expressing affection and asking for support. Who takes such risks and who avoids them? Although several theoretical perspectives suggest that self-esteem plays a crucial role in shaping such behaviors, they can be used to make competing predictions regarding the direction of this effect. Six studies reconcile these contrasting predictions by demonstrating that the effects of self-esteem on behaviors that risk rejection to increase interdependence depend on relational self-construal-that is, the extent to which people define themselves by their close relationships. In Studies 1 and 2, participants were given the opportunity to disclose negative personal information (Study 1) and feelings of intimacy (Study 2) to their dating partners. In Study 3, married couples reported the extent to which they confided in one another. In Study 4, we manipulated self-esteem and relational self-construal, and participants reported their willingness to engage in behaviors that increase interdependence. In Studies 5 and 6, we manipulated the salience of interpersonal risk, and participants reported their willingness to engage in behaviors that risk rejection to increase interdependence. In all 6 studies, self-esteem was positively associated with behaviors that can increase interdependence among people low in relational self-construal but negatively associated with those behaviors among people high in relational self-construal. Accordingly, theoretical descriptions of the role of self-esteem in relationships will be most complete to the extent that they consider the degree to which people define themselves by their close relationships.

Citing Articles

Self-Esteem and College Students' Online Impulse Buying: The Independent and Interactive Moderating Role of Interdependent Self-Construal and Interpersonal Relationships.

Guo T, Cai C, Xu Y, Huang M, Ni Y Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025; 17:4447-4461.

PMID: 39748802 PMC: 11694021. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S494636.


A study on the psychological functioning of children with specific learning difficulties and typically developing children.

Adi N, Othman A, Kuay H, Mustafa Q BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):725.

PMID: 39633446 PMC: 11619105. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02151-4.


How both partners' individual differences, stress, and behavior predict change in relationship satisfaction: Extending the VSA model.

McNulty J, Meltzer A, Neff L, Karney B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(27).

PMID: 34183417 PMC: 8271655. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101402118.


Relationally Charged: How and When Workplace Friendship Facilitates Employee Interpersonal Citizenship.

Xiao J, Mao J, Quan J, Qing T Front Psychol. 2020; 11:190.

PMID: 32153453 PMC: 7045053. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00190.


Personality Traits and Self-Esteem in Combat and Team Sports.

Bojanic Z, Nedeljkovic J, Sakan D, Mitic P, Milovanovic I, Drid P Front Psychol. 2019; 10:2280.

PMID: 31649595 PMC: 6794460. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02280.


References
1.
Murray S, Derrick J, Leder S, Holmes J . Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: a levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 94(3):429-59. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429. View

2.
Murray S, Leder S, McClellan J, Holmes J, Pinkus R, Harris B . Becoming Irreplaceable: How Comparisons to the Partner's Alternatives Differentially Affect Low and High Self-Esteem People. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010; 45(6):1180-1191. PMC: 2783625. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.001. View

3.
ATKINSON J . Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychol Rev. 1957; 64, Part 1(6):359-72. DOI: 10.1037/h0043445. View

4.
Maisel N, Gable S . The paradox of received social support: the importance of responsiveness. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(8):928-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x. View

5.
Birtchnell J . Defining dependence. Br J Med Psychol. 1988; 61(2):111-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02770.x. View