» Articles » PMID: 34175932

An Analysis of Methylome Evolution in Primates

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Jun 27
PMID 34175932
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although the investigation of the epigenome becomes increasingly important, still little is known about the long-term evolution of epigenetic marks and systematic investigation strategies are still lacking. Here, we systematically demonstrate the transfer of classic phylogenetic methods such as maximum likelihood based on substitution models, parsimony, and distance-based to interval-scaled epigenetic data. Using a great apes blood data set, we demonstrate that DNA methylation is evolutionarily conserved at the level of individual CpGs in promotors, enhancers, and genic regions. Our analysis also reveals that this epigenomic conservation is significantly correlated with its transcription factor binding density. Binding sites for transcription factors involved in neuron differentiation and components of AP-1 evolve at a significantly higher rate at methylation than at the nucleotide level. Moreover, our models suggest an accelerated epigenomic evolution at binding sites of BRCA1, chromobox homolog protein 2, and factors of the polycomb repressor 2 complex in humans. For most genomic regions, the methylation-based reconstruction of phylogenetic trees is at par with sequence-based reconstruction. Most strikingly, phylogenetic reconstruction using methylation rates in enhancer regions was ineffective independently of the chosen model. We identify a set of phylogenetically uninformative CpG sites enriched in enhancers controlling immune-related genes.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis reveals epigenomic evolution related to species traits and genomic imprinting in mammals.

Hu Y, Yuan S, Du X, Liu J, Zhou W, Wei F Innovation (Camb). 2023; 4(3):100434.

PMID: 37215528 PMC: 10196708. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100434.


Epigenomic Modifications in Modern and Ancient Genomes.

Niiranen L, Leciej D, Edlund H, Bernhardsson C, Fraser M, Quinto F Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(2).

PMID: 35205223 PMC: 8872240. DOI: 10.3390/genes13020178.

References
1.
Kimura M . A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980; 16(2):111-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF01731581. View

2.
Shavit Grievink L, Penny D, Hendy M, Holland B . Phylogenetic tree reconstruction accuracy and model fit when proportions of variable sites change across the tree. Syst Biol. 2010; 59(3):288-97. PMC: 2850392. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq003. View

3.
Yi S . Insights into Epigenome Evolution from Animal and Plant Methylomes. Genome Biol Evol. 2017; 9(11):3189-3201. PMC: 5721340. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx203. View

4.
Michalak E, Burr M, Bannister A, Dawson M . The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019; 20(10):573-589. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-019-0143-1. View

5.
Perez M, Lehner B . Intergenerational and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in animals. Nat Cell Biol. 2019; 21(2):143-151. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0242-9. View