» Articles » PMID: 33506353

Phasic Pupillary Responses Modulate Object-based Attentional Prioritization

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2021 Jan 28
PMID 33506353
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual attention studies have demonstrated that the shape of space-based selection can be governed by salient object contours: when a portion of an enclosed space is cued, the selected region extends to the full enclosure. Although this form of object-based attention (OBA) is well established, one continuing investigation focuses on whether this selection is obligatory or under voluntary control. We attempt to dissociate between these alternatives by interrogating the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system - known to fluctuate with top-down attention - during a classic two-rectangle paradigm in a sample of healthy human participants (N = 36). An endogenous spatial pre-cue directed voluntary space-based attention (SBA) to one end of a rectangular frame. We manipulated the reliability of the cue, such that targets appearing at an uncued location within the frame occurred at low or moderate frequencies. Phasic pupillary responses time-locked to the cue display served to noninvasively measure LC-NE activity, reflecting top-down processing of the spatial cue. If OBA is controlled analogously to SBA, then object selection should emerge only when it is behaviorally expedient and when LC-NE activity reflects a high degree of top-down attention to the cue display. Our results bore this out. Thus, we conclude that OBA was voluntarily controlled, and furthermore show that phasic norepinephrine may modulate attentional strategy.

Citing Articles

Pupillometry as a biomarker of postural control: Deep-learning models reveal side-specific pupillary responses to increased intensity of balance tasks.

Rosker J, Leskovec T, Tomazin K, Majcen Rosker Z Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(12):e14667.

PMID: 39135357 PMC: 11579225. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14667.


Changes in pupil size track self-control failure.

OBryan S, Price M, Alquist J, Davis T, Scolari M Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(4):829-841.

PMID: 38374223 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06781-3.


Pupillometric parameters of alertness during unpredictable but not predictable smooth pursuit neck torsion test are altered in patients with neck pain disorders: a cross-sectional study.

Majcen Rosker Z, Mocnik G, Kristjansson E, Vodicar M, Rosker J Exp Brain Res. 2023; 241(8):2069-2079.

PMID: 37454001 PMC: 10386920. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06648-z.


Space- and feature-based attention operate both independently and interactively within latent components of perceptual decision making.

Liang G, Poquiz J, Scolari M J Vis. 2023; 23(1):12.

PMID: 36656593 PMC: 9872836. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.1.12.


The Locus Coeruleus Noradrenaline System in Delirium.

Hansen N, Rediske A Front Aging Neurosci. 2021; 13:784356.

PMID: 34955815 PMC: 8692941. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.784356.


References
1.
Al-Janabi S, Greenberg A . Target-object integration, attention distribution, and object orientation interactively modulate object-based selection. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016; 78(7):1968-84. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1126-3. View

2.
Alnaes D, Sneve M, Espeseth T, Endestad T, van de Pavert S, Laeng B . Pupil size signals mental effort deployed during multiple object tracking and predicts brain activity in the dorsal attention network and the locus coeruleus. J Vis. 2014; 14(4). DOI: 10.1167/14.4.1. View

3.
ARRINGTON C, Carr T, Mayer A, Rao S . Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 12 Suppl 2:106-17. DOI: 10.1162/089892900563975. View

4.
Aston-Jones G, Cohen J . An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005; 28:403-50. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709. View

5.
Aston-Jones G, Rajkowski J, Kubiak P, Alexinsky T . Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task. J Neurosci. 1994; 14(7):4467-80. PMC: 6577022. View