» Articles » PMID: 34027093

A Review of Biomimetic Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration: Toward a Cell-free Strategy

Overview
Date 2021 May 24
PMID 34027093
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In clinical terms, bone grafting currently involves the application of autogenous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic bone grafts, as well as natural or artificially synthesized materials, such as polymers, bioceramics, and other composites. Many of these are associated with limitations. The ideal scaffold for bone tissue engineering should provide mechanical support while promoting osteogenesis, osteoconduction, and even osteoinduction. There are various structural complications and engineering difficulties to be considered. Here, we describe the biomimetic possibilities of the modification of natural or synthetic materials through physical and chemical design to facilitate bone tissue repair. This review summarizes recent progresses in the strategies for constructing biomimetic scaffolds, including ion-functionalized scaffolds, decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds, and micro- and nano-scale biomimetic scaffold structures, as well as reactive scaffolds induced by physical factors, and other acellular scaffolds. The fabrication techniques for these scaffolds, along with current strategies in clinical bone repair, are described. The developments in each category are discussed in terms of the connection between the scaffold materials and tissue repair, as well as the interactions with endogenous cells. As the advances in bone tissue engineering move toward application in the clinical setting, the demonstration of the therapeutic efficacy of these novel scaffold designs is critical.

Citing Articles

Nanomaterial application for protein delivery in bone regeneration therapy.

Hariawan B, Miatmoko A, Anjani Q, Annuryanti F, Kamadjaja D, Nurkanto A Braz J Med Biol Res. 2025; 58:e14057.

PMID: 39907403 PMC: 11793153. DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X2024e14057.


Novel Decellularization Scheme for Preparing Acellular Fish Scale Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Su S, Wang R, Bai J, Chen Z, Zhou F ACS Omega. 2025; 10(1):230-238.

PMID: 39829519 PMC: 11740628. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c05096.


Development of Bioinspired Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Inks for Manufacturing Bone Scaffolds by Robocasting.

Tajvar S, Hadjizadeh A, Samandari S 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2025; 11(5):e1850-e1882.

PMID: 39741537 PMC: 11683434. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2023.0082.


Microstructural Analysis of the Human Scapula: Mandibular Bone Tissue Engineering Perspectives.

Tsiklin I, Bezdenezhnych D, Mantsagov A, Kolsanov A, Volova L J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(12).

PMID: 39728186 PMC: 11678577. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15120386.


Enhanced Bioactivity of Chitosan-Alginate-Riboflavin Liquid-Exfoliated Molybdenum Disulfide Nanosheets for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Murugan S, Ha C, Appana Dalavi P, Anil S, Venkatesan J, Seong G ACS Omega. 2024; 9(47):46904-46915.

PMID: 39619530 PMC: 11603203. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06049.


References
1.
Oryan A, Baghaban Eslaminejad M, Kamali A, Hosseini S, Sayahpour F, Baharvand H . Synergistic effect of strontium, bioactive glass and nano-hydroxyapatite promotes bone regeneration of critical-sized radial bone defects. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018; 107(1):50-64. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34094. View

2.
Miron R, Zhang Y . Autologous liquid platelet rich fibrin: A novel drug delivery system. Acta Biomater. 2018; 75:35-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.021. View

3.
White L, Taylor A, Faulk D, Keane T, Saldin L, Reing J . The impact of detergents on the tissue decellularization process: A ToF-SIMS study. Acta Biomater. 2016; 50:207-219. PMC: 5592694. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.033. View

4.
Meng J, Xiao B, Zhang Y, Liu J, Xue H, Lei J . Super-paramagnetic responsive nanofibrous scaffolds under static magnetic field enhance osteogenesis for bone repair in vivo. Sci Rep. 2013; 3:2655. PMC: 3772377. DOI: 10.1038/srep02655. View

5.
Silver I, Murrills R, Etherington D . Microelectrode studies on the acid microenvironment beneath adherent macrophages and osteoclasts. Exp Cell Res. 1988; 175(2):266-76. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(88)90191-7. View