» Articles » PMID: 33970573

Integration of Patient-reported Outcomes in a Total Joint Arthroplasty Program at a High-volume Academic Medical Center

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 May 10
PMID 33970573
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Despite widely appreciated barriers to successful clinical implementation, the literature regarding how to operationalize electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains sparse. We offer a detailed summary of the implementation of PROs into the standard of care at a major tertiary academic medical center.

Methods: Collection of four Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive tests was piloted in a large academic orthopaedic surgery ambulatory clinic starting in October 2016. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive tests (Physical Function, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, and Ability to Return to Social Roles and Activities) were initially implemented as manual order sets to be administered before surgery through 2 years after surgery. Completion rate over time, mean time to completion for all PRO domains, and the overall distribution of symptom severity were used to evaluate the success of the pilot. A subsequent optimization and redesign of the pilot was conducted using tablets, automation of questionnaire deployment, and improved results review to address obstacles encountered during the pilot phase.

Results: Two thousand nine distinct joint arthroplasty patients (mean age = 65) completed at least one set of PRO assessments, with overall completion rates reaching 68% and mean completion time of 3 minutes. Focal points during the implementation process included engagement and training of staff, selection of an appropriate patient population and outcome measures, and user friendly data displays for patients and providers.

Conclusion: Our pilot program successfully demonstrated that PROs can be administered, scored, and made immediately available within the electronic health record to patients and their providers with minimal disruption of clinical workflows. Although considerable operational and technological challenges remain, we found that the implementation of PROs in clinical care within an ambulatory practice at an academic medical center can be achieved through a constellation of several key factors.

Citing Articles

Young or Old Age and Non-White Race Are Associated With Poor Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Compliance After Orthopaedic Surgery.

Levens B, Kim B, Aksu N, Dorris C, Svoboda S, Douoguih W Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023; 5(6):100817.

PMID: 38023444 PMC: 10661514. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100817.


Patient preferences as human factors for health data recommender systems and shared decision making in orthopaedic practice.

Singh A, Schooley B, Floyd S, Pill S, Brooks J Front Digit Health. 2023; 5:1137066.

PMID: 37408539 PMC: 10318339. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1137066.


Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review.

Glenwright B, Simmich J, Cottrell M, OLeary S, Sullivan C, Pole J J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023; 7(1):13.

PMID: 36786914 PMC: 9928985. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00554-2.


Collection and Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Colorectal Surgery Clinic.

Harrison N, Lopez A, Shroder M, Bachmann J, Burnell E, Hopkins M J Surg Res. 2022; 280:515-525.

PMID: 36081311 PMC: 9588722. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.042.


Implementation of an Online Glaucoma-Specific Quality of Life Computerized Adaptive Test System in a US Glaucoma Hospital.

Fenwick E, Roldan A, Halawa O, Meshkin R, Zebardast N, Popov V Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022; 11(2):24.

PMID: 35171226 PMC: 8857615. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.24.


References
1.
Snyder C, Aaronson N, Choucair A, Elliott T, Greenhalgh J, Halyard M . Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2011; 21(8):1305-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-0054-x. View

2.
Rotenstein L, Agarwal A, ONeil K, Kelly A, Keaty M, Whitehouse C . Implementing patient-reported outcome surveys as part of routine care: lessons from an academic radiation oncology department. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(5):964-968. PMC: 7651917. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx009. View

3.
Lavallee D, Austin E, Franklin P . How Can Health Systems Advance Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement?. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018; 44(8):439-440. PMC: 7047893. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.05.005. View

4.
Fung C, Hays R . Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Qual Life Res. 2008; 17(10):1297-302. PMC: 3119524. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9379-5. View

5.
Biber J, Ose D, Reese J, Gardiner A, Facelli J, Spuhl J . Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018; 2:34. PMC: 6097980. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0059-0. View