» Articles » PMID: 30175316

Patient Reported Outcomes - Experiences with Implementation in a University Health Care Setting

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2018 Sep 4
PMID 30175316
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have traditionally been implemented through a manual process of paper and pencil with little standardization throughout a Healthcare System. Each practice has asked patients specific questions to understand the patient's health as it pertains to their specialty. These data were rarely shared and there has not been a comparison of patient's health across different specialty domains. We sought to leverage interoperable electronic systems to provide a standardization of PRO assessments across sites of care.

Methods: University of Utah Health is comprised of four hospitals, 12 community clinics, over 400,000 unique annual patients, and more than 5000 providers. The enterprise wide implementation of PROs started in November of 2015. Patients can complete an assessment at home via email, or within the clinic on a tablet. Each specialty has the opportunity to add additional specialty-specific instruments. We customized the interval with which the patient answers the assessments based on specialty preference in order to minimize patient burden, while maximizing relevant data for clinicians.

Results: Barriers and facilitators were identified in three phases: Pre-implementation, Implementation, and Post-implementation. Each phase was further broken down into technical challenges, content inclusion and exclusion, and organizational strategy. These phases are unique and require collaboration between several groups throughout the organization with support from executive leadership.

Discussion: We are deploying system-wide standard and customized PRO collection with the goals of providing better patient care, improving physician-patient communication, and ultimately improving the value of the care given. Standardized assessment provides any clinician with information to quickly evaluate the overall, physical and mental health of a patient. This information is available real time to aid in patient communication for the clinician.

Citing Articles

Associations of Pretransplant Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Score With Kidney Transplant Outcomes.

Yamauchi J, Cizik A, Fornadi K, Thomas D, Raghavan D, Jweehan D Transpl Int. 2025; 38:13884.

PMID: 39944218 PMC: 11813690. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2025.13884.


Factors that impact the implementation of patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care for peripheral artery disease from the patient perspective.

Holeman T, Hales J, Cizik A, Zickmund S, Kean J, Brooke B Qual Life Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39579272 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03842-6.


The association of diabetes mellitus and routinely collected patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer. A real-world cohort study.

Ose D, Adediran E, Mark B, Ocier K, Dunson Jr W, Turner C Cancer Med. 2024; 13(20):e70246.

PMID: 39445809 PMC: 11500209. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70246.


Patient Experience and Attitudes Toward Electronic Intake and Patient-Reported Outcomes Within an Outpatient Whole Health Center.

Segall T, Rodgers-Melnick S, Surdam J, Srinivasan R, Dusek J Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024; 13:27536130241280181.

PMID: 39350961 PMC: 11440562. DOI: 10.1177/27536130241280181.


APPROACH e-PROM system: a user-centered development and evaluation of an electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system for management of coronary artery disease.

Roberts A, Benterud E, Santana M, Engbers J, Lorenz C, Verdin N J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):102.

PMID: 39196484 PMC: 11358368. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00779-9.


References
1.
Wintner L, Giesinger J, Kemmler G, Sztankay M, Oberguggenberger A, Gamper E . [The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012; 124(9-10):293-303. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-012-0168-3. View

2.
Huebner J, Rose C, Geissler J, Gleiter C, Prott F, Muenstedt K . Integrating cancer patients' perspectives into treatment decisions and treatment evaluation using patient-reported outcomes--a concept paper. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013; 23(2):173-9. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12095. View

3.
Weldring T, Smith S . Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2014; 6:61-8. PMC: 4089835. DOI: 10.4137/HSI.S11093. View

4.
McNamara R, Spatz E, Kelley T, Stowell C, Beltrame J, Heidenreich P . Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4(5). PMC: 4599409. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001767. View

5.
Chang S, Gholizadeh L, Salamonson Y, DiGiacomo M, Betihavas V, Davidson P . Health span or life span: the role of patient-reported outcomes in informing health policy. Health Policy. 2010; 100(1):96-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.07.001. View