A Systematic Review of EMG Applications for the Characterization of Forearm and Hand Muscle Activity During Activities of Daily Living: Results, Challenges, and Open Issues

Overview

Journal Sensors (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biotechnology

Date 2021 Apr 30

PMID 33925928

Citations 17

Authors

Nestor J Jarque-Bou

Joaquin L Sancho-Bru

Margarita Vergara

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The role of the hand is crucial for the performance of activities of daily living, thereby ensuring a full and autonomous life. Its motion is controlled by a complex musculoskeletal system of approximately 38 muscles. Therefore, measuring and interpreting the muscle activation signals that drive hand motion is of great importance in many scientific domains, such as neuroscience, rehabilitation, physiotherapy, robotics, prosthetics, and biomechanics. Electromyography (EMG) can be used to carry out the neuromuscular characterization, but it is cumbersome because of the complexity of the musculoskeletal system of the forearm and hand. This paper reviews the main studies in which EMG has been applied to characterize the muscle activity of the forearm and hand during activities of daily living, with special attention to muscle synergies, which are thought to be used by the nervous system to simplify the control of the numerous muscles by actuating them in task-relevant subgroups. The state of the art of the current results are presented, which may help to guide and foster progress in many scientific domains. Furthermore, the most important challenges and open issues are identified in order to achieve a better understanding of human hand behavior, improve rehabilitation protocols, more intuitive control of prostheses, and more realistic biomechanical models.

Citing Articles

Brain analysis to approach human muscles synergy using deep learning.

Samadi E, Rahatabad F, Nasrabadi A, Dabanlou N Cogn Neurodyn. 2025; 19(1):44.

PMID: 39996071 PMC: 11846801. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-025-10228-y.

Predicting stress levels using physiological data: Real-time stress prediction models utilizing wearable devices.

Lazarou E, Exarchos T AIMS Neurosci. 2024; 11(2):76-102.

PMID: 38988886 PMC: 11230864. DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024006.

Study on Gesture Recognition Method with Two-Stream Residual Network Fusing sEMG Signals and Acceleration Signals.

Hu Z, Wang S, Ou C, Ge A, Li X Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(9).

PMID: 38732808 PMC: 11085498. DOI: 10.3390/s24092702.

Upper Limb Electromyographic Responses to Motor Imagery and Action Observation in Acquired Brain Injury.

Santiago-Martin S, Calvo-Vera A, Bermejo-Gil B, Martin-Nogueras A Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(6).

PMID: 38544063 PMC: 10974024. DOI: 10.3390/s24061802.

Objectivizing Measures of Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation through Multi-Disciplinary Scales.

Marek K, Redlicka J, Miller E, Zubrycki I J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068549 PMC: 10707646. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237497.

References

Tresch M, Jarc A . The case for and against muscle synergies. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009; 19(6):601-7. PMC: 2818278. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.002. View

Castellini C, van der Smagt P . Evidence of muscle synergies during human grasping. Biol Cybern. 2013; 107(2):233-45. DOI: 10.1007/s00422-013-0548-4. View

Hsiao L, Cho C . The effect of aging on muscle activation and postural control pattern for young and older computer users. Appl Ergon. 2012; 43(5):926-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.12.014. View

Kern D, Semmler J, Enoka R . Long-term activity in upper- and lower-limb muscles of humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001; 91(5):2224-32. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.5.2224. View

Barreca S, Gowland C, Stratford P, Huijbregts M, Griffiths J, Torresin W . Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004; 11(4):31-42. DOI: 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W. View

Geethanjali P . Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016; 9:247-55. PMC: 4968852. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S91102. View

Kamavuako E, Farina D, Yoshida K, Jensen W . Relationship between grasping force and features of single-channel intramuscular EMG signals. J Neurosci Methods. 2009; 185(1):143-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.09.006. View

Dietz V, Schrafl-Altermatt M . Control of functional movements in healthy and post-stroke subjects: Role of neural interlimb coupling. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016; 127(5):2286-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.02.014. View

Jarque-Bou N, Vergara M, Sancho-Bru J, Gracia-Ibanez V, Roda-Sales A . A calibrated database of kinematics and EMG of the forearm and hand during activities of daily living. Sci Data. 2019; 6(1):270. PMC: 6848200. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0285-1. View

10.

Birdwell J, Hargrove L, Kuiken T, Weir R . Activation of individual extrinsic thumb muscles and compartments of extrinsic finger muscles. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 110(6):1385-92. PMC: 3763151. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00748.2012. View

11.

Jo H, Maenza C, Good D, Huang X, Park J, Sainburg R . Effects of unilateral stroke on multi-finger synergies and their feed-forward adjustments. Neuroscience. 2016; 319:194-205. PMC: 4770574. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.054. View

12.

Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B . Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006; 16(6):541-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.08.006. View

13.

Ebied A, Kinney-Lang E, Spyrou L, Escudero J . Evaluation of matrix factorisation approaches for muscle synergy extraction. Med Eng Phys. 2018; 57:51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.04.003. View

14.

Johnson S, Mansfield E . Prosthetic training: upper limb. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013; 25(1):133-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.012. View

15.

Hebert J, Lewicke J, Williams T, Vette A . Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014; 51(6):918-32. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.10.0228. View

16.

Sako S, Sugiura H, Tanoue H, Kojima M, Kono M, Inaba R . Electromyographic analysis of relevant muscle groups during completion of computer tasks using different computer mouse positions. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016; 23(2):267-273. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2016.1275140. View

17.

Scano A, Chiavenna A, Molinari Tosatti L, Muller H, Atzori M . Muscle Synergy Analysis of a Hand-Grasp Dataset: A Limited Subset of Motor Modules May Underlie a Large Variety of Grasps. Front Neurorobot. 2018; 12:57. PMC: 6167452. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00057. View

18.

Sorbie G, Hunter H, Grace F, Gu Y, Baker J, Ugbolue U . An electromyographic study of the effect of hand grip sizes on forearm muscle activity and golf performance. Res Sports Med. 2016; 24(3):222-33. DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1191492. View

19.

Jarque-Bou N, Vergara M, Sancho-Bru J, Roda-Sales A, Gracia-Ibanez V . Identification of forearm skin zones with similar muscle activation patterns during activities of daily living. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15(1):91. PMC: 6206932. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0437-0. View

20.

Burkhart T, Andrews D . Kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation patterns of the upper extremity during simulated forward falls. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23(3):688-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.01.015. View