» Articles » PMID: 36981992

Clinical Features to Predict the Use of a SEMG Wearable Device (REMO) for Hand Motor Training of Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study

Abstract

After stroke, upper limb motor impairment is one of the most common consequences that compromises the level of the autonomy of patients. In a neurorehabilitation setting, the implementation of wearable sensors provides new possibilities for enhancing hand motor recovery. In our study, we tested an innovative wearable (REMO) that detected the residual surface-electromyography of forearm muscles to control a rehabilitative PC interface. The aim of this study was to define the clinical features of stroke survivors able to perform ten, five, or no hand movements for rehabilitation training. 117 stroke patients were tested: 65% of patients were able to control ten movements, 19% of patients could control nine to one movement, and 16% could control no movements. Results indicated that mild upper limb motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity ≥ 18 points) predicted the control of ten movements and no flexor carpi muscle spasticity predicted the control of five movements. Finally, severe impairment of upper limb motor function (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity > 10 points) combined with no pain and no restrictions of upper limb joints predicted the control of at least one movement. In conclusion, the residual motor function, pain and joints restriction, and spasticity at the upper limb are the most important clinical features to use for a wearable REMO for hand rehabilitation training.

Citing Articles

Myoelectric pattern recognition with virtual reality and serious gaming improves upper limb function in chronic stroke: a single case experimental design study.

Munoz-Novoa M, Kristoffersen M, Sunnerhagen K, Naber A, Ortiz-Catalan M, Alt Murphy M J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):6.

PMID: 39825410 PMC: 11742229. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01541-y.


Tracking Upper Limb Motion via Wearable Solutions: Systematic Review of Research From 2011 to 2023.

Karoulla E, Matsangidou M, Frangoudes F, Paspalides P, Neokleous K, Pattichis C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26():e51994.

PMID: 39714084 PMC: 11704657. DOI: 10.2196/51994.


Prediction of rehabilitation induced motor recovery after stroke using a multi-dimensional and multi-modal approach.

Salvalaggio S, Turolla A, Ando M, Barresi R, Burgio F, Busan P Front Aging Neurosci. 2023; 15:1205063.

PMID: 37469951 PMC: 10352609. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1205063.

References
1.
Lirio-Romero C, Torres-Lacomba M, Gomez-Blanco A, Acero-Cortes A, Retana-Garrido A, de la Villa-Polo P . Electromyographic biofeedback improves upper extremity function: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2020; 110:54-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.02.002. View

2.
Coupar F, Pollock A, Rowe P, Weir C, Langhorne P . Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2011; 26(4):291-313. DOI: 10.1177/0269215511420305. View

3.
Farina D, Jiang N, Rehbaum H, Holobar A, Graimann B, Dietl H . The extraction of neural information from the surface EMG for the control of upper-limb prostheses: emerging avenues and challenges. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014; 22(4):797-809. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2305111. View

4.
Gandolfi M, Vale N, Posteraro F, Morone G, Dellorco A, Botticelli A . State of the art and challenges for the classification of studies on electromechanical and robotic devices in neurorehabilitation: a scoping review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 57(5):831-840. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06922-7. View

5.
Everard G, Declerck L, Detrembleur C, Leonard S, Bower G, Dehem S . New technologies promoting active upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: an overview and network meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022; 58(4):530-548. PMC: 9980549. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07404-4. View