» Articles » PMID: 33920542

S6K1 Is Indispensible for Stress-Induced Microtubule Acetylation and Autophagic Flux

Overview
Journal Cells
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Apr 30
PMID 33920542
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Autophagy is a specific macromolecule and organelle degradation process. The target macromolecule or organelle is first enclosed in an autophagosome, and then delivered along acetylated microtubules to the lysosome. Autophagy is triggered by stress and largely contributes to cell survival. We have previously shown that S6K1 kinase is essential for autophagic flux under stress conditions. Here, we aimed to elucidate the underlying mechanism of S6K1 involvement in autophagy. We stimulated autophagy in S6K1/2 double-knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts by exposing them to different stress conditions. Transient gene overexpression or silencing, immunoblotting, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, and ratiometric fluorescence analyses revealed that the perturbation of autophagic flux in S6K1-deficient cells did not stem from impaired lysosomal function. Instead, the absence of S6K1 abolished stress-induced tubulin acetylation and disrupted the acetylated microtubule network, in turn impairing the autophagosome-lysosome fusion. S6K1 overexpression restored tubulin acetylation and autophagic flux in stressed S6K1/2-deficient cells. Similar effect of S6K1 status was observed in prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, overexpression of an acetylation-mimicking, but not acetylation-resistant, tubulin variant effectively restored autophagic flux in stressed S6K1/2-deficient cells. Collectively, S6K1 controls tubulin acetylation, hence contributing to the autophagic flux induced by different stress conditions and in different cells.

Citing Articles

Histone deacetylase 6 inhibition promotes microtubule acetylation and facilitates autophagosome-lysosome fusion in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice.

Agrawal A, Clayton E, Cavazos C, Clayton B, Rodney G Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2024; 241(1):e14243.

PMID: 39422111 PMC: 11680461. DOI: 10.1111/apha.14243.


CCT and Cullin1 Regulate the TORC1 Pathway to Promote Dendritic Arborization in Health and Disease.

Lottes E, Ciger F, Bhattacharjee S, Timmins E, Tete B, Tran T Cells. 2024; 13(12.

PMID: 38920658 PMC: 11201622. DOI: 10.3390/cells13121029.


Hyperacetylated microtubules assist porcine deltacoronavirus nsp8 to degrade MDA5 via SQSTM1/p62-dependent selective autophagy.

Li Z, Lai Y, Qiu R, Tang W, Ren J, Xiao S J Virol. 2024; 98(3):e0000324.

PMID: 38353538 PMC: 10949429. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00003-24.


Osthole inhibits malignant phenotypes and induces ferroptosis in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells via suppressing AMPK/Akt signaling.

Zhou X, Kang J, Zhang L, Cheng Y Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2023; 92(2):119-134.

PMID: 37318525 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-023-04549-0.


Tubulin Post-Translational Modifications: The Elusive Roles of Acetylation.

Carmona B, Marinho H, Matos C, Nolasco S, Soares H Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37106761 PMC: 10136095. DOI: 10.3390/biology12040561.


References
1.
Matsuyama A, Shimazu T, Sumida Y, Saito A, Yoshimatsu Y, Seigneurin-Berny D . In vivo destabilization of dynamic microtubules by HDAC6-mediated deacetylation. EMBO J. 2002; 21(24):6820-31. PMC: 139102. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf682. View

2.
Xu M, Li X, Chen Y, Pitzer A, Zhang Y, Li P . Enhancement of dynein-mediated autophagosome trafficking and autophagy maturation by ROS in mouse coronary arterial myocytes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014; 18(11):2165-75. PMC: 4213304. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12326. View

3.
Hansen T, Johansen T . Following autophagy step by step. BMC Biol. 2011; 9:39. PMC: 3107173. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-9-39. View

4.
Yadati T, Houben T, Bitorina A, Shiri-Sverdlov R . : Physiological Function and Role in Disease Management. Cells. 2020; 9(7). PMC: 7407943. DOI: 10.3390/cells9071679. View

5.
Blommaart E, Luiken J, Blommaart P, Van Woerkom G, Meijer A . Phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 is inhibitory for autophagy in isolated rat hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 1995; 270(5):2320-6. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.5.2320. View