» Articles » PMID: 33903985

Improved Genomic Prediction of Clonal Performance in Sugarcane by Exploiting Non-additive Genetic Effects

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Apr 27
PMID 33903985
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-additive genetic effects seem to play a substantial role in the expression of complex traits in sugarcane. Including non-additive effects in genomic prediction models significantly improves the prediction accuracy of clonal performance. In the recent decade, genetic progress has been slow in sugarcane. One reason might be that non-additive genetic effects contribute substantially to complex traits. Dense marker information provides the opportunity to exploit non-additive effects in genomic prediction. In this study, a series of genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models that account for additive and non-additive effects were assessed to improve the accuracy of clonal prediction. The reproducible kernel Hilbert space model, which captures non-additive genetic effects, was also tested. The models were compared using 3,006 genotyped elite clones measured for cane per hectare (TCH), commercial cane sugar (CCS), and Fibre content. Three forward prediction scenarios were considered to investigate the robustness of genomic prediction. By using a pseudo-diploid parameterization, we found significant non-additive effects that accounted for almost two-thirds of the total genetic variance for TCH. Average heterozygosity also had a major impact on TCH, indicating that directional dominance may be an important source of phenotypic variation for this trait. The extended-GBLUP model improved the prediction accuracies by at least 17% for TCH, but no improvement was observed for CCS and Fibre. Our results imply that non-additive genetic variance is important for complex traits in sugarcane, although further work is required to better understand the variance component partitioning in a highly polyploid context. Genomics-based breeding will likely benefit from exploiting non-additive genetic effects, especially in designing crossing schemes. These findings can help to improve clonal prediction, enabling a more accurate identification of variety candidates for the sugarcane industry.

Citing Articles

Integrative multi-environmental genomic prediction in apple.

Jung M, Quesada-Traver C, Roth M, Aranzana M, Muranty H, Rymenants M Hortic Res. 2025; 12(2):uhae319.

PMID: 40041603 PMC: 11879405. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae319.


Genomic prediction accounting for dominance and epistatic genetic effects on litter size traits in Large White pigs.

Chen J, Dou T, Wu Z, Bai L, Xu M, Zhang Y J Anim Sci. 2025; 103.

PMID: 39774780 PMC: 11776020. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaf004.


Exploiting historical agronomic data to develop genomic prediction strategies for early clonal selection in the Louisiana sugarcane variety development program.

Shahi D, Todd J, Gravois K, Hale A, Blanchard B, Kimbeng C Plant Genome. 2024; 18(1):e20545.

PMID: 39740237 PMC: 11685804. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20545.


Potential approaches to create ultimate genotypes in crops and livestock.

Hayes B, Mahony T, Villiers K, Warburton C, Kemper K, Dinglasan E Nat Genet. 2024; 56(11):2310-2317.

PMID: 39402155 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01942-0.


Sparse testing designs for optimizing predictive ability in sugarcane populations.

Garcia-Abadillo J, Adunola P, Silva Aguilar F, Trujillo-Montenegro J, Riascos J, Persa R Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1400000.

PMID: 39109055 PMC: 11300217. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1400000.


References
1.
Hoang N, Furtado A, Botha F, Simmons B, Henry R . Potential for Genetic Improvement of Sugarcane as a Source of Biomass for Biofuels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015; 3:182. PMC: 4646955. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00182. View

2.
Alvarez-Castro J, Crujeiras R . Orthogonal Decomposition of the Genetic Variance for Epistatic Traits Under Linkage Disequilibrium-Applications to the Analysis of Bateson-Dobzhansky-Müller Incompatibilities and Sign Epistasis. Front Genet. 2019; 10:54. PMC: 6411799. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00054. View

3.
Cheverud J, Routman E . Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics. 1995; 139(3):1455-61. PMC: 1206471. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1455. View

4.
Piperidis N, DHont A . Sugarcane genome architecture decrypted with chromosome-specific oligo probes. Plant J. 2020; 103(6):2039-2051. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14881. View

5.
Aitken K, Jackson P, McIntyre C . A combination of AFLP and SSR markers provides extensive map coverage and identification of homo(eo)logous linkage groups in a sugarcane cultivar. Theor Appl Genet. 2005; 110(5):789-801. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1813-7. View