» Articles » PMID: 33880931

Electrocardiographic Imaging of Repolarization Abnormalities

Abstract

Background Dispersion and gradients in repolarization have been associated with life-threatening arrhythmias, but are difficult to quantify precisely from surface electrocardiography. The objective of this study was to evaluate electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to noninvasively detect repolarization-based abnormalities. Methods and Results Ex vivo data were obtained from Langendorff-perfused pig hearts (n=8) and a human donor heart. Unipolar electrograms were recorded simultaneously during sinus rhythm from an epicardial sock and the torso-shaped tank within which the heart was suspended. Regional repolarization heterogeneities were introduced through perfusion of dofetilide and pinacidil into separate perfusion beds. In vivo data included torso and epicardial potentials recorded simultaneously in anesthetized, closed-chest pigs (n=5), during sinus rhythm, and ventricular pacing. For both data sets, ECGI accurately reconstructed T-wave electrogram morphologies when compared with those recorded by the sock (ex vivo: correlation coefficient, 0.85 [0.52-0.96], in vivo: correlation coefficient, 0.86 [0.52-0.96]) and repolarization time maps (ex-vivo: correlation coefficient, 0.73 [0.63-0.83], in vivo: correlation coefficient, 0.76 [0.67-0.82]). ECGI-reconstructed repolarization time distributions were strongly correlated to those measured by the sock (both data sets, ≥0.92). Although the position of the gradient was slightly shifted by 8.3 (0-13.9) mm, the mean, max, and SD between ECGI and recorded gradient values were highly correlated (=0.87, 0.75, and 0.86 respectively). There was no significant difference in ECGI accuracy between ex vivo and in vivo data. Conclusions ECGI reliably and accurately maps potentially critical repolarization abnormalities. This noninvasive approach allows imaging and quantifying individual parameters of abnormal repolarization-based substrates in patients with arrhythmogenesis, to improve diagnosis and risk stratification.

Citing Articles

Variant patterns of electrical activation and recovery in normal human hearts revealed by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging.

Stoks J, Patel K, van Rees B, Nguyen U, Mihl C, Deissler P Europace. 2024; 26(7).

PMID: 38970395 PMC: 11226755. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae172.


Basis and applicability of noninvasive inverse electrocardiography: a comparison between cardiac source models.

van der Waal J, Meijborg V, Coronel R, Dubois R, Oostendorp T Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1295103.

PMID: 38152249 PMC: 10752226. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1295103.


Investigation into the importance of using natural PVCs and pathological models for potential-based ECGI validation.

Bear L, Bergquist J, Abell E, Cochet H, MacLeod R, Dubois R Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1198002.

PMID: 37275229 PMC: 10232953. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1198002.


Understanding repolarization in the intracardiac unipolar electrogram: A long-lasting controversy revisited.

Stoks J, Bear L, Vijgen J, Dendale P, Peeters R, Volders P Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1158003.

PMID: 37089414 PMC: 10119409. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1158003.


Tipping the scales of understanding: An engineering approach to design and implement whole-body cardiac electrophysiology experimental models.

Zenger B, Bergquist J, Busatto A, Good W, Rupp L, Sharma V Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1100471.

PMID: 36744034 PMC: 9893785. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1100471.


References
1.
Ghanem R, Burnes J, Waldo A, Rudy Y . Imaging dispersion of myocardial repolarization, II: noninvasive reconstruction of epicardial measures. Circulation. 2001; 104(11):1306-12. DOI: 10.1161/hc3601.094277. View

2.
Leong K, Ng F, Roney C, Cantwell C, Shun-Shin M, Linton N . Repolarization abnormalities unmasked with exercise in sudden cardiac death survivors with structurally normal hearts. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017; 29(1):115-126. DOI: 10.1111/jce.13375. View

3.
Bear L, LeGrice I, Sands G, Lever N, Loiselle D, Paterson D . How Accurate Is Inverse Electrocardiographic Mapping? A Systematic In Vivo Evaluation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11(5):e006108. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006108. View

4.
van der Waal J, Meijborg V, Schuler S, Coronel R, Oostendorp T . In silico validation of electrocardiographic imaging to reconstruct the endocardial and epicardial repolarization pattern using the equivalent dipole layer source model. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020; 58(8):1739-1749. PMC: 7340677. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02203-y. View

5.
Zhang J, Sacher F, Hoffmayer K, OHara T, Strom M, Cuculich P . Cardiac electrophysiological substrate underlying the ECG phenotype and electrogram abnormalities in Brugada syndrome patients. Circulation. 2015; 131(22):1950-9. PMC: 4452400. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013698. View