» Articles » PMID: 29477975

Cardiac Electrical Dyssynchrony is Accurately Detected by Noninvasive Electrocardiographic Imaging

Overview
Journal Heart Rhythm
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Feb 26
PMID 29477975
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Poor identification of electrical dyssynchrony is postulated to be a major factor contributing to the low success rate for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of body surface mapping and electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) to detect electrical dyssynchrony noninvasively.

Methods: Langendorff-perfused pig hearts (n = 11) were suspended in a human torso-shaped tank, with left bundle branch block (LBBB) induced through ablation. Recordings were taken simultaneously from a 108-electrode epicardial sock and 128 electrodes embedded in the tank surface during sinus rhythm and ventricular pacing. Computed tomography provided electrode and heart positions in the tank. Epicardial unipolar electrograms were reconstructed from torso potentials using ECGi. Dyssynchrony markers from torso potentials (eg, QRS duration) or ECGi (total activation time, interventricular delay [D-LR], and intraventricular markers) were correlated with those recorded from the sock.

Results: LBBB was induced (n = 8), and sock-derived activation maps demonstrated interventricular dyssynchrony (D-LR and total activation time) in all cases (P < .05) and intraventricular dyssynchrony for complete LBBB (P < .05) compared to normal sinus rhythm. Only D-LR returned to normal with biventricular pacing (P = .1). Torso markers increased with large degrees of dyssynchrony, and no reduction was seen during biventricular pacing (P > .05). Although ECGi-derived markers were significantly lower than recorded (P < .05), there was a significant strong linear relationship between ECGi and recorded values. ECGi correctly diagnosed electrical dyssynchrony and interventricular resynchronization in all cases. The latest site of activation was identified to 9.1 ± 0.6 mm by ECGi.

Conclusion: ECGi reliably and accurately detects electrical dyssynchrony, resynchronization by biventricular pacing, and the site of latest activation, providing more information than do body surface potentials.

Citing Articles

Quest for the ideal assessment of electrical ventricular dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Nguyen U, Vernooy K, Prinzen F J Mol Cell Cardiol Plus. 2025; 7():100061.

PMID: 39802441 PMC: 11708375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmccpl.2024.100061.


Systematic review of computational techniques, dataset utilization, and feature extraction in electrocardiographic imaging.

Mayorca-Torres D, Leon-Salas A, Peluffo-Ordonez D Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025; .

PMID: 39779645 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03264-z.


Variant patterns of electrical activation and recovery in normal human hearts revealed by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging.

Stoks J, Patel K, van Rees B, Nguyen U, Mihl C, Deissler P Europace. 2024; 26(7).

PMID: 38970395 PMC: 11226755. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae172.


Basis and applicability of noninvasive inverse electrocardiography: a comparison between cardiac source models.

van der Waal J, Meijborg V, Coronel R, Dubois R, Oostendorp T Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1295103.

PMID: 38152249 PMC: 10752226. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1295103.


Comparison of dipole-based and potential-based ECGI methods for premature ventricular contraction beat localization with clinical data.

Dogrusoz Y, Rasoolzadeh N, Ondrusova B, Hlivak P, Zelinka J, Tysler M Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1197778.

PMID: 37362428 PMC: 10288213. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1197778.