» Articles » PMID: 33841778

3D Genital Shape Complexity in Female Marine Mammals

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2021 Apr 12
PMID 33841778
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Comparisons of 3D shapes have recently been applied to diverse anatomical structures using landmarking techniques. However, discerning evolutionary patterns can be challenging for structures lacking homologous landmarks. We used alpha shape analyses to quantify vaginal shape complexity in 40 marine mammal specimens including cetaceans, pinnipeds, and sirenians. We explored phylogenetic signal and the potential roles of natural and sexual selection on vaginal shape evolution. Complexity scores were consistent with qualitative observations. Cetaceans had a broad range of alpha complexities, while pinnipeds were comparatively simple and sirenians were complex. Intraspecific variation was found. Three-dimensional surface heat maps revealed that shape complexity was driven by invaginations and protrusions of the vaginal wall. Phylogenetic signal was weak and metrics of natural selection (relative neonate size) and sexual selection (relative testes size, sexual size dimorphism, and penis morphology) did not explain vaginal complexity patterns. Additional metrics, such as penile shape complexity, may yield interesting insights into marine mammal genital coevolution. We advocate for the use of alpha shapes to discern patterns of evolution that would otherwise not be possible in 3D anatomical structures lacking homologous landmarks.

Citing Articles

Rapid divergent evolution of internal female genitalia and the coevolution of male genital morphology revealed by micro-computed tomography.

Sloan N, Harvey M, Huey J, Simmons L Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2015):20232883.

PMID: 38290544 PMC: 10827428. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2883.


A landmark-free analysis of the pelvic girdle in Sulawesi ricefishes (Adrianichthyidae): How 2D and 3D geometric morphometrics can complement each other in the analysis of a complex structure.

Spanke T, Gabelaia M, Flury J, Hilgers L, Wantania L, Misof B Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(10):e10613.

PMID: 37859830 PMC: 10582673. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10613.


Baculum shape complexity correlates to metrics of post-copulatory sexual selection in Musteloidea.

Clear E, Grant R, Gardiner J, Brassey C J Morphol. 2023; 284(4):e21572.

PMID: 36806148 PMC: 10952176. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21572.


Female Genital Variation Far Exceeds that of Male Genitalia: A Review of Comparative Anatomy of Clitoris and the Female Lower Reproductive Tract in Theria.

Pavlicev M, Herdina A, Wagner G Integr Comp Biol. 2022; .

PMID: 35524696 PMC: 9494530. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icac026.


3D genital shape complexity in female marine mammals.

Orbach D, Brassey C, Gardiner J, Brennan P Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(7):3210-3218.

PMID: 33841778 PMC: 8019040. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7269.

References
1.
Orbach D, Brennan P, Hedrick B, Keener W, Webber M, Mesnick S . Asymmetric and Spiraled Genitalia Coevolve with Unique Lateralized Mating Behavior. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):3257. PMC: 7039966. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60287-w. View

2.
Hosken D, Stockley P . Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 19(2):87-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.012. View

3.
Foley N, Springer M, Teeling E . Mammal madness: is the mammal tree of life not yet resolved?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016; 371(1699). PMC: 4920340. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0140. View

4.
Pennell M, Eastman J, Slater G, Brown J, Uyeda J, FitzJohn R . geiger v2.0: an expanded suite of methods for fitting macroevolutionary models to phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(15):2216-8. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu181. View

5.
Orbach D, Marshall C, Wursig B, Mesnick S . Variation in Female Reproductive Tract Morphology of the Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016; 299(4):520-37. DOI: 10.1002/ar.23318. View