Combining Geometric Morphometrics and Functional Simulation: an Emerging Toolkit for Virtual Functional Analyses

Overview

Journal J Anat

Specialty Anatomy & Histology

Date 2010 Oct 1

PMID 20880075

Citations 38

Authors

Paul OHiggins

Samuel N Cobb

Laura C Fitton

Flora Groning

Roger Phillips

Jia Liu

Michael J Fagan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The development of virtual methods for anatomical reconstruction and functional simulation of skeletal structures offers great promise in evolutionary and ontogenetic investigations of form-function relationships. Key developments reviewed here include geometric morphometric methods for the analysis and visualization of variations in form (size and shape), finite element methods for the prediction of mechanical performance of skeletal structures under load and multibody dynamics methods for the simulation and prediction of musculoskeletal function. These techniques are all used in studies of form and function in biology, but only recently have they been combined in novel ways to facilitate biomechanical modelling that takes account of variations in form, can statistically compare performance, and relate performance to form and its covariates. Here we provide several examples that illustrate how these approaches can be combined and we highlight areas that require further investigation and development before we can claim a mature theory and toolkit for a statistical biomechanical framework that unites these methods.

Citing Articles

Generating novel tennis racket shape concepts using a theoretical morphospace.

Grant R, Bonhomme V, Allen T PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310155.

PMID: 39264952 PMC: 11392236. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310155.

A Comparison of Semilandmarking Approaches in the Analysis of Size and Shape.

Shui W, Profico A, OHiggins P Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37048435 PMC: 10093231. DOI: 10.3390/ani13071179.

A Comparison of Semilandmarking Approaches in the Visualisation of Shape Differences.

Shui W, Profico A, OHiggins P Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36766273 PMC: 9913739. DOI: 10.3390/ani13030385.

Does the model reflect the system? When two-dimensional biomechanics is not 'good enough'.

Smith A, Davis J, Panagiotopoulou O, Taylor A, Robinson C, Ward C J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(198):20220536.

PMID: 36695017 PMC: 9874278. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0536.

Phenotypic variability in traits related to flight dispersal in the wing dimorphic species Triatoma guasayana.

Gigena G, Rodriguez C, Fiad F, Hernandez M, Carbajal-de-la-Fuente A, Piccinali R Parasit Vectors. 2023; 16(1):8.

PMID: 36624528 PMC: 9830765. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-022-05570-7.

References

Kay C, SCAPINO R, Kay E . A cinephotographic study of the role of the canine in limiting lateral jaw movement in Macaca fascicularis. J Dent Res. 1986; 65(11):1300-2. DOI: 10.1177/00220345860650110301. View

McHenry H . Tempo and mode in human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91(15):6780-6. PMC: 44283. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6780. View

Huiskes R . If bone is the answer, then what is the question?. J Anat. 2000; 197 ( Pt 2):145-56. PMC: 1468114. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19720145.x. View

Sellers W, Crompton R . Using sensitivity analysis to validate the predictions of a biomechanical model of bite forces. Ann Anat. 2004; 186(1):89-95. DOI: 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80132-8. View

Hylander W, Ravosa M, Ross C, Wall C, Johnson K . Symphyseal fusion and jaw-adductor muscle force: an EMG study. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000; 112(4):469-92. DOI: 10.1002/1096-8644(200008)112:4<469::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-V. View

Rohlf F, Corti M . Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape. Syst Biol. 2002; 49(4):740-53. DOI: 10.1080/106351500750049806. View

Westneat M . A biomechanical model for analysis of muscle force, power output and lower jaw motion in fishes. J Theor Biol. 2003; 223(3):269-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00058-4. View

Moazen M, Curtis N, OHiggins P, Evans S, Fagan M . Biomechanical assessment of evolutionary changes in the lepidosaurian skull. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(20):8273-7. PMC: 2688846. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0813156106. View

Strait D, Richmond B, Spencer M, Ross C, Dechow P, Wood B . Masticatory biomechanics and its relevance to early hominid phylogeny: an examination of palatal thickness using finite-element analysis. J Hum Evol. 2007; 52(5):585-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.11.019. View

10.

Wang Q, Strait D, Dechow P . A comparison of cortical elastic properties in the craniofacial skeletons of three primate species and its relevance to the study of human evolution. J Hum Evol. 2006; 51(4):375-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.010. View

11.

Frost H . Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003; 275(2):1081-101. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.10119. View

12.

Gunz P, Mitteroecker P, Neubauer S, Weber G, Bookstein F . Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. J Hum Evol. 2009; 57(1):48-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.04.004. View

13.

Groning F, Liu J, Fagan M, OHiggins P . Validating a voxel-based finite element model of a human mandible using digital speckle pattern interferometry. J Biomech. 2009; 42(9):1224-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.025. View

14.

Pierce S, Angielczyk K, Rayfield E . Patterns of morphospace occupation and mechanical performance in extant crocodilian skulls: a combined geometric morphometric and finite element modeling approach. J Morphol. 2008; 269(7):840-64. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10627. View

15.

Richmond B, Wright B, Grosse I, Dechow P, Ross C, Spencer M . Finite element analysis in functional morphology. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2005; 283(2):259-74. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20169. View

16.

Gupta K, Knoell A, Grenoble D . Mathematical modeling and structural analysis of the mandible. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs. 1973; 1(3):469-79. DOI: 10.3109/10731197309118557. View

17.

Sigal I, Yang H, Roberts M, Crawford Downs J . Morphing methods to parameterize specimen-specific finite element model geometries. J Biomech. 2009; 43(2):254-62. PMC: 2813388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.036. View

18.

Spencer M, Demes B . Biomechanical analysis of masticatory system configuration in Neandertals and Inuits. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993; 91(1):1-20. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330910102. View

19.

Ross C, Patel B, Slice D, Strait D, Dechow P, Richmond B . Modeling masticatory muscle force in finite element analysis: sensitivity analysis using principal coordinates analysis. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2005; 283(2):288-99. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20170. View

20.

Hylander W . Experimental analysis of temporomandibular joint reaction force in macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1979; 51(3):433-56. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330510317. View