» Articles » PMID: 33805324

Methane Emissions from Ruminants in Australia: Mitigation Potential and Applicability of Mitigation Strategies

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2021 Apr 3
PMID 33805324
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anthropomorphic greenhouse gases are raising the temperature of the earth and threatening ecosystems. Since 1950 atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased 28%, while methane has increased 70%. Methane, over the first 20 years after release, has 80-times more warming potential as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Enteric methane from microbial fermentation of plant material by ruminants contributes 30% of methane released into the atmosphere, which is more than any other single source. Numerous strategies were reviewed to quantify their methane mitigation potential, their impact on animal productivity and their likelihood of adoption. The supplements, 3-nitrooxypropanol and the seaweed, , reduced methane emissions by 40+% and 90%, respectively, with increases in animal productivity and small effects on animal health or product quality. Manipulation of the rumen microbial population can potentially provide intergenerational reduction in methane emissions, if treated animals remain isolated. Genetic selection, vaccination, grape marc, nitrate or biochar reduced methane emissions by 10% or less. Best management practices and cattle browsing legumes, or species, result in small levels of methane mitigation and improved animal productivity. Feeding large amounts daily of ground wheat reduced methane emissions by around 35% in dairy cows but was not sustained over time.

Citing Articles

Network analyses unraveled the complex interactions in the rumen microbiota associated with methane emission in dairy cattle.

Ye X, Sahana G, Lund M, Li B, Cai Z Anim Microbiome. 2025; 7(1):24.

PMID: 40069804 PMC: 11899718. DOI: 10.1186/s42523-025-00386-z.


The roles of phytogenic feed additives, trees, shrubs, and forages on mitigating ruminant methane emission.

Bature I, Xiaohu W, Ding X Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1475322.

PMID: 39649683 PMC: 11622700. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1475322.


Improving Undernutrition with Microalgae.

Panchal S, Heimann K, Brown L Nutrients. 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39339823 PMC: 11435262. DOI: 10.3390/nu16183223.


Comparative Analysis of Gut Bacterial Diversity in Wild and Domestic Yaks on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Shah T, Guo X, Song Y, Fang Y, Ding L Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39199914 PMC: 11350814. DOI: 10.3390/ani14162380.


Editing microbes to mitigate enteric methane emissions in livestock.

Khan F, Ali A, Wu D, Huang C, Zulfiqar H, Ali M World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 40(10):300.

PMID: 39134917 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-024-04103-x.


References
1.
Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T, Joseph S, Lehmann J . Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 114:644-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022. View

2.
Davison T, Black J, Moss J . Red meat-an essential partner to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. Anim Front. 2020; 10(4):14-21. PMC: 7596805. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfaa035. View

3.
Clauss M, Dittmann M, Vendl C, Hagen K, Frei S, Ortmann S . Review: Comparative methane production in mammalian herbivores. Animal. 2020; 14(S1):s113-s123. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731119003161. View

4.
Meale S, Popova M, Saro C, Martin C, Bernard A, Lagree M . Early life dietary intervention in dairy calves results in a long-term reduction in methane emissions. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):3003. PMC: 7862406. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82084-9. View

5.
Hixson J, Jacobs J, Wilkes E, Smith P . Survey of the Variation in Grape Marc Condensed Tannin Composition and Concentration and Analysis of Key Compositional Factors. J Agric Food Chem. 2016; 64(38):7076-86. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03126. View