» Articles » PMID: 33770207

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Drugs and Metabolites: a Multiplatform Comparison

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2021 Mar 26
PMID 33770207
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) provides insight into the molecular distribution of a broad range of compounds and, therefore, is frequently applied in the pharmaceutical industry. Pharmacokinetic and toxicological studies deploy MSI to localize potential drugs and their metabolites in biological tissues but currently require other analytical tools to quantify these pharmaceutical compounds in the same tissues. Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging (Q-MSI) is a field with challenges due to the high biological variability in samples combined with the limited sample cleanup and separation strategies available prior to MSI. In consequence, more selectivity in MSI instruments is required. This can be provided by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) which uses specific precursor ion-product ion transitions. This targeted approach is in particular suitable for pharmaceutical compounds because their molecular identity is known prior to analysis. In this work, we compared different analytical platforms to assess the performance of MRM detection compared to other MS instruments/MS modes used in a Q-MSI workflow for two drug candidates (A and B). Limit of detection (LOD), linearity, and precision and accuracy of high and low quality control (QC) samples were compared between MS instruments/modes. MRM mode on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (QqQ) provided the best overall performance with the following results for compounds A and B: LOD 35.5 and 2.5 μg/g tissue, R 0.97 and 0.98 linearity, relative standard deviation QC <13.6%, and 97-112% accuracy. Other MS modes resulted in LOD 6.7-569.4 and 2.6-119.1 μg/g tissue, R 0.86-0.98 and 0.86-0.98 linearity, relative standard deviation QC < 19.4 and < 37.5%, and 70-356% and 64-398% accuracy for drug candidates A and B, respectively. In addition, we propose an optimized 3D printed mimetic tissue model to increase the overall analytical throughput of our approach for large animal studies. The MRM imaging platform was applied as proof-of-principle for quantitative detection of drug candidates A and B in four dog livers and compared to LC-MS. The Q-MSI concentrations differed <3.5 times with the concentrations observed by LC-MS. Our presented MRM-based Q-MSI approach provides a more selective and high-throughput analytical platform due to MRM specificity combined with an optimized 3D printed mimetic tissue model.

Citing Articles

Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Spatial Toxicology Research.

Qiu T J Mass Spectrom. 2024; 59(12):e5104.

PMID: 39624029 PMC: 11612705. DOI: 10.1002/jms.5104.


Novel mimetic tissue standards for precise quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of drug and neurotransmitter concentrations in rat brain tissues.

Watanabe K, Takayama S, Yamada T, Hashimoto M, Tadano J, Nakagawa T Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 416(26):5579-5593.

PMID: 39126505 PMC: 11493812. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05477-5.


Mass spectrometry imaging for spatially resolved multi-omics molecular mapping.

Zhang H, Lu K, Ebbini M, Huang P, Lu H, Li L Npj Imaging. 2024; 2(1):20.

PMID: 39036554 PMC: 11254763. DOI: 10.1038/s44303-024-00025-3.


Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging: therapeutics & biomolecules.

Holbrook J, Kemper G, Hummon A Chem Commun (Camb). 2024; 60(16):2137-2151.

PMID: 38284765 PMC: 10878071. DOI: 10.1039/d3cc05988j.


Toward Omics-Scale Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Lipids in Brain Tissue Using a Multiclass Internal Standard Mixture.

Vandenbosch M, Mutuku S, Mantas M, Patterson N, Hallmark T, Claesen M Anal Chem. 2023; 95(51):18719-18730.

PMID: 38079536 PMC: 11372745. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02724.


References
1.
Barry J, Groseclose M, Castellino S . Quantification and assessment of detection capability in imaging mass spectrometry using a revised mimetic tissue model. Bioanalysis. 2019; 11(11):1099-1116. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2019-0035. View

2.
Jadoul L, Smargiasso N, Pamelard F, Alberts D, Noel A, De Pauw E . An Improved Molecular Histology Method for Ion Suppression Monitoring and Quantification of Phosphatidyl Cholines During MALDI MSI Lipidomics Analyses. OMICS. 2016; 20(2):110-21. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2015.0165. View

3.
Groseclose M, Castellino S . A mimetic tissue model for the quantification of drug distributions by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2013; 85(21):10099-106. DOI: 10.1021/ac400892z. View

4.
Hopfgartner G, Varesio E, Stoeckli M . Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric imaging of complete rat sections using a triple quadrupole linear ion trap. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009; 23(6):733-6. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3934. View

5.
Vallianatou T, Strittmatter N, Nilsson A, Shariatgorji M, Hamm G, Pereira M . A mass spectrometry imaging approach for investigating how drug-drug interactions influence drug blood-brain barrier permeability. Neuroimage. 2018; 172:808-816. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.013. View