» Articles » PMID: 33727342

Proteomic Analysis of Src Family Kinase Phosphorylation States in Cancer Cells Suggests Deregulation of the Unique Domain

Overview
Journal Mol Cancer Res
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2021 Mar 17
PMID 33727342
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Src family kinases (SFK) are homologs of retroviral oncogenes, earning them the label of proto-oncogenes. Their functions are influenced by positive and negative regulatory tyrosine phosphorylation events and inhibitory and activating intramolecular and extramolecular interactions. This regulation is disrupted in their viral oncogene counterparts. However, in contrast to most other proto-oncogenes, the genetic alteration of these genes does not seem to occur in human tumors and how and whether their functions are altered in human cancers remain to be determined. To look for proteomic-level alterations, we took a more granular look at the activation states of SFKs based on their two known regulatory tyrosine phosphorylations, but found no significant differences in their activity states when comparing immortalized epithelial cells with cancer cells. SFKs are known to have other less well-studied phosphorylations, particularly within their unstructured N-terminal unique domains (UD), although their role in cancers has not been explored. In comparing panels of epithelial cells with cancer cells, we found a decrease in S17 phosphorylation in the UD of Src in cancer cells. Dephosphorylated S17 favors the dimerization of Src that is mediated through the UD and suggests increased Src dimerization in cancers. These data highlight the important role of the UD of Src and suggest that a deeper understanding of proteomic-level alterations of the unstructured UD of SFKs may provide considerable insights into how SFKs are deregulated in cancers. IMPLICATIONS: This work highlights the role of the N-terminal UD of Src kinases in regulating their signaling functions and possibly in their deregulation in human cancers.

Citing Articles

Structure of Full-Length Src Kinase and Its Key Phosphorylated States: Molecular Dynamics Study.

Strelkova M, Tolstova A, Mitkevich V, Petrushanko I, Makarov A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596456 PMC: 11594451. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212391.


The importance of protein domain mutations in cancer therapy.

Chitluri K, Emerson I Heliyon. 2024; 10(6):e27655.

PMID: 38509890 PMC: 10950675. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27655.


Metastasis of cervical cancer indicated by elevation of serum CA125 produced by mediastinal lymph nodes: a case report.

Honda K, Miyama M, Nishii Y, Tasaka R, Nakano Y, Umesaki N J Med Case Rep. 2024; 18(1):112.

PMID: 38402387 PMC: 10894469. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04417-2.


Inhibitor Trapping in N-Myristoyltransferases as a Mechanism for Drug Potency.

Spassov D, Atanasova M, Doytchinova I Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(14).

PMID: 37511367 PMC: 10380619. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411610.


Modulation of Functional Phosphorylation Sites by Basic Residues in the Unique Domain of c-Src.

Lang A, Fernandez A, Diaz-Lobo M, Vilanova M, Cardenas F, Gairi M Molecules. 2023; 28(12).

PMID: 37375241 PMC: 10304449. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28124686.


References
1.
Gubens M, Burns M, Perkins S, San Pedro-Salcedo M, Althouse S, Loehrer P . A phase II study of saracatinib (AZD0530), a Src inhibitor, administered orally daily to patients with advanced thymic malignancies. Lung Cancer. 2015; 89(1):57-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.04.008. View

2.
Erpel T, Courtneidge S . Src family protein tyrosine kinases and cellular signal transduction pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995; 7(2):176-82. DOI: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80025-5. View

3.
Kasahara K, Nakayama Y, Kihara A, Matsuda D, Ikeda K, Kuga T . Rapid trafficking of c-Src, a non-palmitoylated Src-family kinase, between the plasma membrane and late endosomes/lysosomes. Exp Cell Res. 2007; 313(12):2651-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.05.001. View

4.
Van Roey K, Gibson T, Davey N . Motif switches: decision-making in cell regulation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012; 22(3):378-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.03.004. View

5.
Shattil S . Integrins and Src: dynamic duo of adhesion signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2005; 15(8):399-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.06.005. View