» Articles » PMID: 20339285

Assessing the Privacy Risks of Data Sharing in Genomics

Overview
Specialties Genetics
Public Health
Date 2010 Mar 27
PMID 20339285
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The protection of identity of participants in medical research has traditionally been guaranteed by the maintenance of the confidentiality of health information through mechanisms such as only releasing data in an aggregated form or after identifying variables have been removed. This protection of privacy is regarded as a fundamental principle of research ethics, through which the support of research participants and the public is maintained. Whilst this traditional model was adopted for genetics and genomics research, and was generally considered broadly fit for purpose, we argue that this approach is increasingly untenable in genomics. Privacy risk assessments need to have regard to the whole data environment, not merely the quality of the dataset to be released in isolation. As sources of data proliferate, issues of privacy protection are increasingly problematic in relation to the release of genomic data. However, we conclude that, by paying careful attention to potential pitfalls, scientific funders and researchers can take an important part in attempts to safeguard the public and ensure the continuation of potentially important scientific research.

Citing Articles

Assessing Privacy Vulnerabilities in Genetic Data Sets: Scoping Review.

Thomas M, Mackes N, Preuss-Dodhy A, Wieland T, Bundschus M JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2024; 5:e54332.

PMID: 38935957 PMC: 11165293. DOI: 10.2196/54332.


Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research.

Cunha-Oliveira T, Ioannidis J, Oliveira P Physiol Rev. 2024; 104(3):1387-1408.

PMID: 38451234 PMC: 11380994. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2023.


Enhancing public health research: a viewpoint report on the transition to secure, cloud-based systems.

Pelegrini Morita P, Kaur J, Miranda P Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1270450.

PMID: 38259746 PMC: 10800498. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1270450.


The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond.

Ziemann M, Poulain P, Bora A Brief Bioinform. 2023; 24(6).

PMID: 37870287 PMC: 10591307. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad375.


Public Health Genomics: Time to Sharpen the Focus.

McBride C, Roberts J, Knerr S, Guan Y Public Health Genomics. 2023; 26(1):171-176.

PMID: 37729876 PMC: 10614505. DOI: 10.1159/000533985.


References
1.
Nyholt D, Yu C, Visscher P . On Jim Watson's APOE status: genetic information is hard to hide. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008; 17(2):147-9. PMC: 2986051. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.198. View

2.
Malin B, Sweeney L . How (not) to protect genomic data privacy in a distributed network: using trail re-identification to evaluate and design anonymity protection systems. J Biomed Inform. 2004; 37(3):179-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.04.005. View

3.
Gitschier J . Inferential genotyping of Y chromosomes in Latter-Day Saints founders and comparison to Utah samples in the HapMap project. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 84(2):251-8. PMC: 2668019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.018. View

4.
Lunshof J, Chadwick R, Vorhaus D, Church G . From genetic privacy to open consent. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9(5):406-11. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2360. View

5.
Cassa C, Schmidt B, Kohane I, Mandl K . My sister's keeper?: genomic research and the identifiability of siblings. BMC Med Genomics. 2008; 1:32. PMC: 2503988. DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-1-32. View