» Articles » PMID: 33705843

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress and Rest T1-mapping Using Regadenoson for Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease Compared to Healthy Controls

Abstract

Background: Adenosine stress T1-mapping on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can differentiate between normal, ischemic, infarcted, and remote myocardial tissue classes without the need for contrast agents. Regadenoson, a selective coronary vasodilator, is often used in stress perfusion imaging when adenosine is contra-indicated, and has advantages in ease of administration, safety profile, and clinical workflow. We aimed to characterize the regadenoson stress T1-mapping response in healthy individuals, and to investigate its ability to differentiate between myocardial tissue classes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: Eleven healthy controls and 25 patients with CAD underwent regadenoson stress perfusion CMR, as well as rest and stress ShMOLLI T1-mapping. Native T1 values and stress T1 reactivity were derived for normal myocardium in healthy controls and for different myocardial tissue classes in patients with CAD.

Results: Healthy controls had normal myocardial native T1 values at rest (931 ± 22 ms) with significant global regadenoson stress T1 reactivity (δT1 = 8.2 ± 0.8% relative to baseline; p < 0.0001). Infarcted myocardium had significantly higher resting T1 (1215 ± 115 ms) than ischemic, remote, and normal myocardium (all p < 0.0001) with an abolished stress T1 response (δT1 = -0.8% [IQR: -1.9-0.5]). Ischemic myocardium had elevated resting T1 compared to normal (964 ± 57 ms; p < 0.01) with an abolished stress T1 response (δT1 = 0.5 ± 1.6%). Remote myocardium in patients had comparable resting T1 to normal (949 ms [IQR: 915-973]; p = 0.06) with blunted stress reactivity (δT1 = 4.3% [IQR: 3.1-6.3]; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Healthy controls demonstrate significant stress T1 reactivity during regadenoson stress. Regadenoson stress and rest T1-mapping is a viable alternative to adenosine and exercise for the assessment of CAD and can distinguish between normal, ischemic, infarcted, and remote myocardium.

Citing Articles

Clinical Applications of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parametric Mapping.

Muser D, Chahal A, Selvanayagam J, Nucifora G Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202304 PMC: 11353869. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161816.


Potential of non-contrast stress T1 mapping for the assessment of myocardial injury in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Kosuge H, Hachiya S, Fujita Y, Hida S, Chikamori T J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023; 25(1):53.

PMID: 37759307 PMC: 10536753. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00966-5.


Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) Applications in Patients with Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review.

Zareiamand H, Darroudi A, Mohammadi I, Moravvej S, Danaei S, Alizadehsani R Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(16).

PMID: 37627926 PMC: 10453831. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162667.


Histopathologic Validation of Stress T1 Mapping in Myocardial Ischemia: Another Step toward Clinical Translation?.

Burrage M, Ferreira V Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2023; 5(3):e230145.

PMID: 37404785 PMC: 10316296. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230145.


Detection of Myocardial Ischemia Using Cardiovascular MRI Stress T1 Mapping: A Miniature-Swine Validation Study.

Zhuang B, Cui C, He J, Xu J, Yin G, Duan X Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2023; 5(3):e220092.

PMID: 37404782 PMC: 10316297. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.220092.


References
1.
Shah R, Sree Raman K, Walls A, Woodman R, Faull R, Gleadle J . Gadolinium-Free Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress T1 Mapping in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12(10):2083-2085. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.016. View

2.
Greenwood J, Maredia N, Younger J, Brown J, Nixon J, Everett C . Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2011; 379(9814):453-60. PMC: 3273722. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4. View

3.
Le D, Bin J, Coggins M, Wei K, Lindner J, Kaul S . Relation between myocardial oxygen consumption and myocardial blood volume: a study using myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002; 15(9):857-63. DOI: 10.1067/mje.2002.121275. View

4.
Kwong R, Ge Y, Steel K, Bingham S, Abdullah S, Fujikura K . Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation of Patients With Chest Pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74(14):1741-1755. PMC: 8109181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.074. View

5.
Liu A, Wijesurendra R, Francis J, Robson M, Neubauer S, Piechnik S . Adenosine Stress and Rest T1 Mapping Can Differentiate Between Ischemic, Infarcted, Remote, and Normal Myocardium Without the Need for Gadolinium Contrast Agents. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 9(1):27-36. PMC: 4708879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.018. View