» Articles » PMID: 36741851

Stress CMR T1-mapping Technique for Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in a Rabbit Model of Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Validation Against Histopathologic Changes

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an early character of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and is indicative of adverse events. The present study aimed to validate the performance of the stress T1 mapping technique on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for identifying CMD from a histopathologic perspective and to establish the time course of CMD-related parameters in a rabbit model of T2DM.

Methods: New Zealand white rabbits ( = 30) were randomly divided into a control ( = 8), T2DM 5-week ( = 6), T2DM 10-week ( = 9), and T2DM 15-week ( = 7) groups. The CMR protocol included rest and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stress T1-mapping imaging using the 5b(20b)3b-modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) schema to quantify stress T1 response (stress ΔT1), and first-pass perfusion CMR to quantify myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI). After the CMR imaging, myocardial tissue was subjected to hematoxylin-eosin staining to evaluate pathological changes, Masson trichrome staining to measure collagen volume fraction (CVF), and CD31 staining to measure microvascular density (MVD). The associations between CMR parameters and pathological findings were determined using Pearson correlation analysis.

Results: The stress ΔT1 values were 6.21 ± 0.59%, 4.88 ± 0.49%, 3.80 ± 0.40%, and 3.06 ± 0.54% in the control, T2DM 5-week, 10-week, and 15-week groups, respectively ( < 0.001) and were progressively weakened with longer duration of T2DM. Furthermore, a significant correlation was demonstrated between the stress ΔT1 vs. CVF and MVD ( = -0.562 and 0.886, respectively; < 0.001).

Conclusion: The stress T1 response correlated well with the histopathologic measures in T2DM rabbits, indicating that it may serve as a sensitive CMD-related indicator in early T2DM.

Citing Articles

Recent Progress of Cardiac MRI for Nuclear Medicine Professionals.

Choe Y, Kim S Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 58(7):431-448.

PMID: 39635630 PMC: 11612075. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-024-00850-9.


Potential of non-contrast stress T1 mapping for the assessment of myocardial injury in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Kosuge H, Hachiya S, Fujita Y, Hida S, Chikamori T J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023; 25(1):53.

PMID: 37759307 PMC: 10536753. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00966-5.


Application of robot-assisted endoscopic technique in the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in 106 children.

Ying L, Wang X, Liu X, Tan Z, Yu J, Yang L J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(4):1371-1379.

PMID: 36646967 PMC: 10374795. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01537-7.

References
1.
Feng Y, He T, Carpenter J, Jabbour A, Alam M, Gatehouse P . In vivo comparison of myocardial T1 with T2 and T2* in thalassaemia major. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 38(3):588-93. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24010. View

2.
Larghat A, Swoboda P, Biglands J, Kearney M, Greenwood J, Plein S . The microvascular effects of insulin resistance and diabetes on cardiac structure, function, and perfusion: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15(12):1368-76. PMC: 4240406. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu142. View

3.
Puntmann V, Voigt T, Chen Z, Mayr M, Karim R, Rhode K . Native T1 mapping in differentiation of normal myocardium from diffuse disease in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6(4):475-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.08.019. View

4.
Mahmod M, Piechnik S, Levelt E, Ferreira V, Francis J, Lewis A . Adenosine stress native T1 mapping in severe aortic stenosis: evidence for a role of the intravascular compartment on myocardial T1 values. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014; 16:92. PMC: 4237748. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-014-0092-y. View

5.
Beckman J, Paneni F, Cosentino F, Creager M . Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: part II. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(31):2444-52. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht142. View